• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为对德国优先事项设定辩论的贡献的健康经济评估的各个方面

[Aspects of health economic evaluations as a contribution to the priority-setting debate in Germany].

作者信息

Brüggenjürgen B

机构信息

Steinbeis-Hochschule-Berlin, Gürtelstr. 29A/30, 10247 Berlin.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):890-5. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1118-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-010-1118-8
PMID:20853085
Abstract

Decision-making in healthcare is a priority-setting process. Tools used in health economic evaluation support decision-making by outlining complex interdependences, simulating short- and long-term consequences, and quantifying formal comparisons of health technologies. Key elements in health economic evaluations are patient-relevant outcomes and cost parameters. Costing of healthcare services is demanding and reflects only an approximation to reality, particularly in Germany, as the reimbursement schemes neither fully provide all details nor the different costing perspectives. Hence, in order to obtain uniform and cross-indication applicable cost parameters, a German standard cost dataset is necessary. In addition, patient-relevant and indication-specific sets of outcomes parameters should be agreed upon in order to also enable a reliable clinical product development. Economic aspects could be applied in a two-step decision-making approach, where initially the anticipated indication-specific technical efficiency level in terms of cost per adjusted life years would be assessed from a health system perspective. The second step would employ prioritization based on indication-relevant outcomes and ranking criteria in the individual patient decision situation. Health economic evaluations are relevant tools to support prioritization of health technologies, both on an individual as well as public health level.

摘要

医疗保健中的决策是一个确定优先事项的过程。卫生经济评估中使用的工具通过概述复杂的相互依存关系、模拟短期和长期后果以及量化卫生技术的正式比较来支持决策。卫生经济评估的关键要素是与患者相关的结果和成本参数。医疗服务的成本核算要求很高,而且只是对现实的一种近似反映,在德国尤其如此,因为报销方案既没有完全提供所有细节,也没有涵盖不同的成本核算视角。因此,为了获得统一且适用于不同适应症的成本参数,德国标准成本数据集是必要的。此外,还应商定与患者相关且针对特定适应症的结果参数集,以便也能实现可靠的临床产品开发。经济方面可应用于两步决策方法,首先从卫生系统的角度评估预期的特定适应症技术效率水平,即每调整生命年的成本。第二步将根据个体患者决策情况下与适应症相关的结果和排名标准进行优先级排序。卫生经济评估是支持在个体以及公共卫生层面确定卫生技术优先顺序的相关工具。

相似文献

1
[Aspects of health economic evaluations as a contribution to the priority-setting debate in Germany].作为对德国优先事项设定辩论的贡献的健康经济评估的各个方面
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):890-5. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1118-8.
2
[Decision support through economic evaluation from the perspective of science in Germany].[从德国科学视角看经济评估的决策支持]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 May;55(5):660-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1466-7.
3
[Priority setting in healthcare. What can Germany learn from other countries?].[医疗保健中的优先事项设定。德国能从其他国家学到什么?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):882-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1115-y.
4
The impact of health economic evaluations in Sweden.健康经济评估在瑞典的影响。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
5
[Ethical basis of priority setting in healthcare].[医疗保健中确定优先次序的伦理基础]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):867-73. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1116-x.
6
Priority-setting, rationing and cost-effectiveness in the German health care system.德国医疗保健系统中的优先事项设定、资源分配与成本效益
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Aug;16(3):327-39. doi: 10.1007/s11019-012-9423-7.
7
[Priorization in healthcare. An important duty, an unnecessary luxury, or playing with fire? A sociomedical point of view].[医疗保健中的优先排序。一项重要职责、一种不必要的奢侈,还是在玩火?一种社会医学视角]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):874-81. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1112-1.
8
[Decision-analytical modelling of costs per QALY in the context of the German Social Law].[德国社会法背景下每质量调整生命年成本的决策分析模型]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Nov;71(11):739-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220756. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
9
[Prioritization is actually quite a self-evident evaluation process, however it may not supplant the important debate about rationalization (interview by Heiner Raspe and Sabine Stumpf)].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):404-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
10
Decision making in Germany: is health economic evaluation as a supporting tool a sleeping beauty?德国的决策制定:作为一种辅助工具的健康经济评估是睡美人吗?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 7.