• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Prioritization is actually quite a self-evident evaluation process, however it may not supplant the important debate about rationalization (interview by Heiner Raspe and Sabine Stumpf)].

作者信息

Schlenker Rolf-Ulrich, Raspe Heiner, Stumpf Sabine

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):404-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.011
PMID:22857726
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
[Prioritization is actually quite a self-evident evaluation process, however it may not supplant the important debate about rationalization (interview by Heiner Raspe and Sabine Stumpf)].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):404-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
2
[Rationing health care by thresholds for clinical benefit and its acceptance by the German population].[通过临床获益阈值分配医疗保健及其被德国民众接受的情况]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
3
[Critical reflections on the prioritisation debate: are we setting the right priorities to address our prioritisation challenges?].对优先事项辩论的批判性反思：我们是否在设定正确的优先事项以应对优先事项方面的挑战？
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
4
[National and regional prioritisation in Swedish health care: experiences from cardiology].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
[Prioritization in health care 2012 - on the current status of the discussion].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
[Priority setting in healthcare. What can Germany learn from other countries?].[医疗保健中的优先事项设定。德国能从其他国家学到什么？]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010 Sep;53(9):882-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-010-1115-y.
7
[Why rationing of medical services is no simple solution].[为何医疗服务配给并非简单的解决方案]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002 Jul 26;127(30):1573-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32937.
8
[Risks and chances of prioritization].[优先级划分的风险与机遇]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2012 Apr;51(2):107-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306291. Epub 2012 May 8.
9
[Performance in the tension field of rationalization and rationing].[在合理化与配给的张力场中的表现]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:764-7.
10
[The national public discourse on priority setting in health care in German print media].[德国平面媒体上关于医疗保健领域优先事项设定的全国性公共讨论]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jun 28.