Sands T W, Hill K A, Petras M L
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Biochem Genet. 1990 Oct;28(9-10):523-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00554380.
Comparisons of the sensitivities of one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) electrophoreses to detect genetic variability have generally shown that the 2D approach appears to be two- to five-fold less sensitive than conventional 1D approaches. Concerns about the validity of this conclusion have arisen because such comparisons have involved mainly enzymic proteins in 1D approaches versus a complex mixture of soluble proteins in most 2D analyses. Comparisons involving the absolute number of variants detected, using 1D and 2D sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), denatured mouse blood proteins isolated from C3HeB/FeJ and C57B1/6J inbred strains of mice, and highly sensitive silver staining, indicate that the latter uncovers at least as much variability as the former. Although the relative percentage of variable bands (1D SDS-PAGE) was greater than the relative percentage of variable spots (2D SDS-PAGE) when proteins of intact erythrocytes were surveyed, both techniques uncovered approximately equal percentages of variable proteins when the mouse erythrocyte proteins were partitioned into membrane and lysate components. Therefore, the simpler 1D SDS-PAGE was found to be as effective as 2D SDS-PAGE in detecting protein variability. Since 1D SDS-PAGE separates proteins primarily on the basis of molecular weight and to a lesser degree on other primary protein sequence alterations, much of the variability observed by 2D SDS-PAGE may be due to these same features and unit charge differences may not play a significant role in detecting variability in the proteins studied. This differs from enzymic proteins, where such charge differences appear to be responsible for much of the variability. This study also indicated that decreasing the number of proteins in samples (membranes and lysates vs whole erythrocytes) increased the ability of both of these techniques to resolve differences. Mating studies indicated that most of the differences detected with both techniques were inherited and were not artifacts.
一维(1D)和二维(2D)电泳检测遗传变异性的灵敏度比较通常表明,二维方法的灵敏度似乎比传统的一维方法低两到五倍。由于此类比较主要涉及一维方法中的酶蛋白与大多数二维分析中的可溶性蛋白复杂混合物,因此人们对这一结论的有效性产生了担忧。使用一维和二维十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(PAGE)、从C3HeB/FeJ和C57B1/6J近交系小鼠中分离的变性小鼠血液蛋白以及高灵敏度银染,对检测到的变体绝对数量进行比较,结果表明,后者发现的变异性至少与前者一样多。尽管在检测完整红细胞蛋白时,可变条带的相对百分比(一维SDS-PAGE)大于可变斑点的相对百分比(二维SDS-PAGE),但当将小鼠红细胞蛋白分为膜和裂解物成分时,两种技术发现的可变蛋白百分比大致相等。因此,发现更简单的一维SDS-PAGE在检测蛋白质变异性方面与二维SDS-PAGE一样有效。由于一维SDS-PAGE主要根据分子量分离蛋白质,在较小程度上根据其他一级蛋白质序列改变进行分离,二维SDS-PAGE观察到的许多变异性可能归因于这些相同特征,单位电荷差异可能在检测所研究蛋白质的变异性方面不起重要作用。这与酶蛋白不同,在酶蛋白中,这种电荷差异似乎是导致许多变异性的原因。这项研究还表明,减少样品中的蛋白数量(膜和裂解物与全红细胞)可提高这两种技术分辨差异的能力。交配研究表明,两种技术检测到的大多数差异是可遗传的,而非人为因素造成的。