Svozilkova Petra, Heissigerova Jarmila, Brichova Michaela, Kalvodova Bohdana, Dvorak Jan, Rihova Eva
Department of Ophthalmology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):89-97. doi: 10.5301/ejo.2010.4040.
To assess the diagnostic yield of vitreous fluid analysis and the therapeutic effect of pars plana vitrectomy in patients with suspected intraocular inflammation.
During 2004-2008, pars plana vitrectomy was performed in 89 patients (101 eyes) out of 1233 patients with uveitis. Vitreous specimens were analyzed by cytologic and histopathologic examination, microbiologic culture, polymerase chain reaction, antibody determination, and flow cytometry. Vitrectomy was performed in 85 eyes for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes; the remaining 16 eyes underwent only diagnostic pars plana vitrectomy. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was compared.
Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 40 patients, malignant masquerade syndrome in 10 patients, and idiopathic uveitis in 39 patients. Vitreous analysis contributed to the determination of diagnosis in 54 patients (61%). Final diagnoses were infection in 42 patients, malignant masquerade syndrome in 6 patients, benign masquerade syndrome in 16 patients, and idiopathic uveitis in 25 patients. Vitreous fluid collected from each eye underwent approximately 2.2 (range 1-6) laboratory tests. Therapeutic reasons for vitrectomy were the treatment of complications of uveitis in 42 eyes and/or intravitreal application of anti-infectious or cytostatic drugs in 49 eyes. Overall, the visual acuity improved in 45% of eyes, remained unchanged in 45% of eyes, and decreased in 10% of eyes in 3 months after surgery.
Pars plana vitrectomy with carefully selected testing is a valuable tool for assessment of diagnosis in a large proportion of patients with uveitis. Moreover, the therapeutic effect of vitrectomy can improve the visual outcomes in these patients.
评估玻璃体液分析的诊断率以及在疑似眼内炎症患者中行玻璃体切割术的治疗效果。
在2004年至2008年期间,1233例葡萄膜炎患者中有89例(101只眼)接受了玻璃体切割术。通过细胞学和组织病理学检查、微生物培养、聚合酶链反应、抗体测定及流式细胞术对玻璃体标本进行分析。85只眼的玻璃体切割术兼具诊断和治疗目的;其余16只眼仅接受诊断性玻璃体切割术。比较术前和术后最佳矫正视力。
术前诊断为感染40例,恶性伪装综合征10例,特发性葡萄膜炎39例。玻璃体分析有助于54例(61%)患者的诊断确定。最终诊断为感染42例,恶性伪装综合征6例,良性伪装综合征16例,特发性葡萄膜炎25例。每只眼收集的玻璃体液平均接受约2.2次(范围1 - 6次)实验室检查。玻璃体切割术的治疗原因包括治疗葡萄膜炎并发症42只眼和/或眼内应用抗感染或细胞毒性药物49只眼。总体而言,术后3个月,45%的患眼视力提高,45%的患眼视力不变,10%的患眼视力下降。
精心选择检测项目的玻璃体切割术是评估大部分葡萄膜炎患者诊断的重要工具。此外,玻璃体切割术的治疗效果可改善这些患者的视力预后。