• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支血管病变患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果:分期 PCI 可显著降低死亡率。

Outcomes from patients with multi-vessel disease following primary PCI: staged PCI imparts very low mortality.

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):617-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22784.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22784
PMID:20853369
Abstract

BACKGROUND

CABG and PCI are effective means for revascularization of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but previous studies have not focused on treatment of patients that first undergo primary PCI.

METHODS

Among patients enrolled in the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE), clinical outcomes for patients presenting with STEMI treated with primary PCI were compared according to whether residual stenoses were treated medically, surgically, or with staged PCI. Clinical characteristics and data pertaining to major adverse cardiac events during hospitalization and 6 months after discharge were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 1,705 patients included, 1,345 (79%) patients were treated medically, 303 (18%) underwent staged PCI, and 57 (3.3%) underwent CABG following primary PCI. Hospital mortality was lowest among patients treated with staged PCI (Medical = 5.7%; PCI = 0.7%; CABG = 3.5%; P < 0.001 [PCI vs. Medical]), a finding that persisted after risk adjustment (Odds Ratio PCI vs. Medical 5 0.16, [0.04-0.68]; P 5 0.01). Six month postdischarge mortality likewise was lowest in the staged PCI group (Medical = 3.1%; PCI = 0.8%; CABG = 4.0%; P = 0.04 [PCI vs. Medical]). Patients revascularized surgically were rehospitalized less frequently (Medical = 20%; PCI = 19%; CABG = 6.3%; P < 0.05) and underwent fewer unscheduled procedures (Medical 5 9.8%; PCI = 10.0%; CABG = 0.0%; P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this multinational registry demonstrate that hospital mortality in patients who undergo staged percutaneous revascularization of multivessel coronary disease following primary PCI is very low. Patients undergoing CABG following primary PCI are hospitalized less frequently and undergo fewer unplanned catheter-based procedures.

摘要

背景

CABG 和 PCI 是多支冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建的有效手段,但以前的研究并未关注首先接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的治疗。

方法

在全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)中,根据初次 PCI 后残余狭窄是否接受药物、手术或分期 PCI 治疗,比较接受直接 PCI 治疗的 STEMI 患者的临床结局。收集住院期间和出院后 6 个月内主要不良心脏事件的临床特征和数据。

结果

在纳入的 1705 例患者中,1345 例(79%)患者接受药物治疗,303 例(18%)接受分期 PCI,57 例(3.3%)在初次 PCI 后行 CABG。接受分期 PCI 的患者住院死亡率最低(药物治疗=5.7%;PCI=0.7%;CABG=3.5%;P<0.001[PCI 与药物治疗相比]),风险调整后仍保持这种结果(PCI 与药物治疗相比的优势比 PCI 50.16,[0.04-0.68];P=0.01)。同样,出院后 6 个月的死亡率在分期 PCI 组最低(药物治疗=3.1%;PCI=0.8%;CABG=4.0%;P=0.04[PCI 与药物治疗相比])。接受手术血运重建的患者再住院频率较低(药物治疗=20%;PCI=19%;CABG=6.3%;P<0.05),且接受的非计划性介入程序较少(药物治疗=9.8%;PCI=10.0%;CABG=0.0%;P<0.02)。

结论

这项多中心注册研究的结果表明,在初次 PCI 后接受多支冠状动脉疾病分期经皮血运重建的患者的住院死亡率非常低。初次 PCI 后行 CABG 的患者住院频率较低,且接受的非计划性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗程序较少。

相似文献

1
Outcomes from patients with multi-vessel disease following primary PCI: staged PCI imparts very low mortality.多支血管病变患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果:分期 PCI 可显著降低死亡率。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):617-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22784.
2
The GRACE of staged revascularization after primary angioplasty st-elevation myocardial infarction.直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死后分期血运重建的GRACE研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):623-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23081.
3
The ability to achieve complete revascularization is associated with improved in-hospital survival in cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: Manitoba cardiogenic SHOCK Registry investigators.能够实现完全血运重建与因心肌梗死导致的心源性休克患者住院期间生存率的提高相关:马尼托巴省心源性休克注册研究人员。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;78(4):540-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23006. Epub 2011 May 5.
4
Outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the New York State experience.有和无心脏外科旁路移植术医院 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的转归:纽约州经验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(6):519-27. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.894048. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
5
Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的临床特征和早期死亡率:来自澳大利亚和新西兰心脏与胸外科医师协会(ASCTS)和墨尔本介入治疗组(MIG)登记处的见解。
Heart Lung Circ. 2009 Jun;18(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
6
Revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: strategy selection and systematic risk assessment.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的血运重建:策略选择和系统风险评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):199-205. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24323. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
7
Revascularization use and survival outcomes after cardiac catheterization in British Columbia and Alberta.不列颠哥伦比亚省和艾伯塔省心脏导管插入术后血运重建的使用情况及生存结果。
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Dec;20(14):1417-23.
8
Should we revascularize patients with moderate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Mar 1;71(4):549-50. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21533.
9
[Correlation between previous coronary artery stenting and early mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery].[冠状动脉搭桥手术患者既往冠状动脉支架置入与早期死亡率的相关性]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2013 Dec;62(6):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting.支架置入时代介入医生的手术量、经验及委员会认证对冠状动脉血管成形术结果的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Aug 15;94(4):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.056.

引用本文的文献

1
Staged revascularization and multi-modal mechanical circulatory supports in a patient with severe cardiogenic shock due to acute-on-chronic coronary syndrome.慢性冠脉综合征急性发作导致严重心源性休克患者的分期血运重建及多模式机械循环支持
J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Nov 20;2023(11):rjad631. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjad631. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建:当代综述
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Apr 7;20(5):41. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0636-9.
3
Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.
急性心肌梗死和多血管病变的再灌注策略。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):665-678. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.88. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行血运重建的比较
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;11(4):499-506. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1419-5. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
5
Factors affecting outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.影响急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的因素。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2013 Jun;9(4):241-6.