Department of Geriatric Medicine/Gerontology, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 346 Grosvenor Hall, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
J Behav Med. 2011 Apr;34(2):102-11. doi: 10.1007/s10865-010-9292-6. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
This research tested if a 12-session coping improvement group intervention (n = 104) reduced depressive symptoms in HIV-infected older adults compared to an interpersonal support group intervention (n = 105) and an individual therapy upon request (ITUR) control condition (n = 86). Participants were 295 HIV-infected men and women 50-plus years of age living in New York City, Cincinnati, OH, and Columbus, OH. Using A-CASI assessment methodology, participants provided data on their depressive symptoms using the Geriatric Depression Screening Scale (GDS) at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 4- and 8-month follow-up. Whether conducted with all participants (N = 295) or only a subset of participants diagnosed with mild, moderate, or severe depressive symptoms (N = 171), mixed models analyses of repeated measures found that both coping improvement and interpersonal support group intervention participants reported fewer depressive symptoms than ITUR controls at post-intervention, 4-month follow-up, and 8-month follow-up. The effect sizes of the differences between the two active interventions and the control group were greater when outcome analyses were limited to those participants with mild, moderate, or severe depressive symptoms. At no assessment period did coping improvement and interpersonal support group intervention participants differ in depressive symptoms.
本研究旨在测试 12 节应对改善小组干预(n=104)是否比人际支持小组干预(n=105)和按需个体治疗(n=86)更能减轻 HIV 感染的老年成年人的抑郁症状。参与者是居住在纽约市、俄亥俄州辛辛那提和哥伦布的 295 名 HIV 感染的 50 岁以上的男性和女性。使用 A-CASI 评估方法,参与者使用老年抑郁量表(GDS)在干预前、干预后以及 4 个月和 8 个月随访时提供他们的抑郁症状数据。无论是对所有参与者(n=295)还是仅对被诊断为轻度、中度或重度抑郁症状的一部分参与者(n=171)进行分析,重复测量混合模型分析发现,应对改善和人际支持小组干预组参与者在干预后、4 个月随访和 8 个月随访时报告的抑郁症状比 ITUR 对照组少。当将结果分析限于有轻度、中度或重度抑郁症状的参与者时,两个积极干预组和对照组之间的差异的效应大小更大。在任何评估期间,应对改善和人际支持小组干预组参与者的抑郁症状均无差异。