Suppr超能文献

改善感染艾滋病毒成年人心理健康的社会心理团体干预措施。

Psychosocial group interventions to improve psychological well-being in adults living with HIV.

作者信息

van der Heijden Ingrid, Abrahams Naeemah, Sinclair David

机构信息

Gender and Health Unit, Medical Research Council, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Western Cape, South Africa, 7505.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK, L3 5QA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 14;3(3):CD010806. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010806.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Being diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and labelled with a chronic, life-threatening, and often stigmatizing disease, can impact on a person's well-being. Psychosocial group interventions aim to improve life-functioning and coping as individuals adjust to the diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of psychosocial group interventions for improving the psychological well-being of adults living with HIV/AIDS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases up to 14 March 2016: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2016), PubMed (MEDLINE) (1996 to 14 March 2016), Embase (1996 to 14 March 2016), and Clinical Trials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that compared psychosocial group interventions with versus control (standard care or brief educational interventions), with at least three months follow-up post-intervention. We included trials that reported measures of depression, anxiety, stress, or coping using standardized scales.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened abstracts, applied the inclusion criteria, and extracted data. We compared continuous outcomes using mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and pooled data using a random-effects model. When the included trials used different measurement scales, we pooled data using standardized mean difference (SMD) values. We reported trials that we could not include in the meta analysis narratively in the text. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 trials (19 articles) that enrolled 2520 adults living with HIV. All the interventions were multifaceted and included a mix of psychotherapy, relaxation, group support, and education. The included trials were conducted in the USA (12 trials), Canada (one trial), Switzerland (one trial), Uganda (one trial), and South Africa (one trial), and published between 1996 and 2016. Ten trials recruited men and women, four trials recruited homosexual men, and two trials recruited women only. Interventions were conducted with groups of four to 15 people, for 90 to 135 minutes, every week for up to 12 weeks. All interventions were conducted face-to-face except two, which were delivered by telephone. All were delivered by graduate or postgraduate trained health, psychology, or social care professionals except one that used a lay community health worker and two that used trained mindfulness practitioners.Group-based psychosocial interventions based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may have a small effect on measures of depression, and this effect may last for up to 15 months after participation in the group sessions (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.10; 1139 participants, 10 trials, low certainty evidence). Most trials used the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), which has a maximum score of 63, and the mean score in the intervention groups was around 1.4 points lower at the end of follow-up. This small benefit was consistent across five trials where participants had a mean depression score in the normal range at baseline, but trials where the mean score was in the depression range at baseline effects were less consistent. Fewer trials reported measures of anxiety, where there may be little or no effect (four trials, 471 participants, low certainty evidence), stress, where there may be little or no effect (five trials, 507 participants, low certainty evidence), and coping (five trials, 697 participants, low certainty evidence).Group-based interventions based on mindfulness have not demonstrated effects on measures of depression (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.03; 233 participants, 2 trials, very low certainty evidence), anxiety (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.15; 62 participants, 2 trials, very low certainty evidence), or stress (MD -2.02, 95% CI -4.23 to 0.19; 137 participants, 2 trials, very low certainty evidence). No mindfulness based interventions included in the studies had any valid measurements of coping.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Group-based psychosocial interventions may have a small effect on measures of depression, but the clinical importance of this is unclear. More high quality evidence is needed to assess whether group psychosocial intervention improve psychological well-being in HIV positive adults.

摘要

背景

被诊断感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV),且被贴上一种慢性、危及生命且常伴有污名化的疾病标签,可能会影响一个人的幸福感。心理社会小组干预旨在随着个体适应诊断结果而改善生活功能和应对能力。

目的

研究心理社会小组干预对改善感染HIV/AIDS的成年人心理健康状况的有效性。

检索方法

截至2016年3月14日,我们检索了以下电子数据库:Cochrane图书馆(2016年第2期)中发表的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、PubMed(MEDLINE,1996年至2016年3月14日)、Embase(1996年至2016年3月14日)以及ClinicalTrials.gov。

入选标准

随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验,将心理社会小组干预与对照(标准护理或简短教育干预)进行比较,干预后至少随访三个月。我们纳入了使用标准化量表报告抑郁、焦虑、压力或应对措施的试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立筛选摘要、应用纳入标准并提取数据。我们使用平均差(MD)及95%置信区间(95%CI)比较连续结局,并使用随机效应模型合并数据。当纳入的试验使用不同的测量量表时,我们使用标准化平均差(SMD)值合并数据。我们在文中以叙述方式报告了无法纳入荟萃分析的试验。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

我们纳入了16项试验(19篇文章),共招募了2520名感染HIV的成年人。所有干预措施都是多方面的,包括心理治疗、放松、小组支持和教育的组合。纳入的试验在美国进行了12项(试验)、加拿大1项、瑞士1项、乌干达1项和南非1项,发表时间在1996年至2016年之间。10项试验招募了男性和女性,4项试验招募了男同性恋者,2项试验仅招募了女性。干预措施针对4至15人的小组进行,每次90至135分钟,每周进行,最长持续12周。除两项通过电话进行外,所有干预均为面对面进行。除一项使用非专业社区卫生工作者以及两项使用经过培训的正念练习者外,所有干预均由经过研究生或研究生以上培训的健康、心理学或社会护理专业人员实施。基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的小组心理社会干预可能对抑郁测量指标有较小影响,且这种影响在参加小组课程后可能持续长达15个月(SMD -0.26,95%CI -0.42至-0.10;1139名参与者,10项试验,低确定性证据)。大多数试验使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI),其最高分为63分,干预组在随访结束时的平均得分低约1.4分。在五项试验中,参与者在基线时的平均抑郁得分处于正常范围,这种小的益处是一致的,但在基线平均得分处于抑郁范围的试验中,效果不太一致。较少试验报告焦虑测量指标,可能几乎没有或没有影响(4项试验,471名参与者,低确定性证据),压力测量指标可能几乎没有或没有影响(5项试验,507名参与者,低确定性证据),以及应对测量指标(5项试验,697名参与者,低确定性证据)。基于正念的小组干预未显示对抑郁测量指标有影响(SMD -0.23,95%CI -0.49至0.03;233名参与者,2项试验,极低确定性证据)、焦虑测量指标(SMD -0.16,95%CI -0.47至0.15;62名参与者,2项试验,极低确定性证据)或压力测量指标(MD -2.02,95%CI -4.23至0.19;137名参与者,2项试验,极低确定性证据)。纳入研究中的基于正念的干预措施均未对应对进行任何有效测量。

作者结论

小组心理社会干预可能对抑郁测量指标有较小影响,但其临床重要性尚不清楚。需要更多高质量证据来评估小组心理社会干预是否能改善HIV阳性成年人的心理健康状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c407/6464500/2b3ee3f7feaa/nCD010806-AFig-FIG01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验