• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对科托努(贝宁)2008年霍乱疫情应对质量的评估]

[Assessment of the quality of response to the 2008 cholera outbreak in Contonou (Benin)].

作者信息

Makoutodé Michel, Diallo Fatoumata, Mongbo Virginie, Guévart Edouard, Bazira Léodégal

机构信息

Institut régional de la santé Publique Alfred Comlan Quenum de Quidah, BP 384, Route des esclaves, Bénin.

出版信息

Sante Publique. 2010 Jul-Aug;22(4):425-35.

PMID:20858341
Abstract

To assess the quality of the response to the 2008 outbreak of cholera in Cotonou (Benin), this retrospective study focused on the health professionals managing the response, community leaders, cases of cholera found in homes and health service documents. The terms of reference used for the purposes of this assessment included the WHO recommendations and the rules set out in the national plan for the fight against epidemics. The resources and method used in this study complied with the norms specified in the plan, as did the epidemiologic follow-up. Community and family interventions concerned only a limited number of households in comparison with the total number of cases. Of the 402 cases diagnosed between July 28th and October 16th 2008, 384 cases were given treatment complying with the specified protocols, and just one death was recorded (hospital lethality 0.25%). The mean length of hospitalization was 2.43 days ± 1.16. Compliance with standard response procedures resulted in good quality care and very low lethality. The national plan of response to epidemics is therefore validated. An improved management of outbreaks requires national multi-sector coordination. Authorities in the following areas need to be involved: healthcare, environment, education, public administration and local communities.

摘要

为评估对科托努(贝宁)2008年霍乱疫情应对措施的质量,这项回顾性研究聚焦于负责应对工作的卫生专业人员、社区领袖、家庭中发现的霍乱病例以及卫生服务文件。本次评估所使用的职权范围包括世界卫生组织的建议以及国家抗击流行病计划中规定的规则。本研究中使用的资源和方法以及流行病学随访均符合该计划规定的规范。与病例总数相比,社区和家庭干预仅涉及有限数量的家庭。在2008年7月28日至10月16日期间确诊的402例病例中,384例按照规定方案接受了治疗,仅记录到1例死亡(医院病死率0.25%)。平均住院时间为2.43天±1.16天。对标准应对程序的遵守带来了高质量的护理和极低的病死率。因此,国家流行病应对计划得到了验证。改善疫情管理需要国家多部门协调。以下领域的当局需要参与其中:医疗保健、环境、教育、公共行政和当地社区。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of the quality of response to the 2008 cholera outbreak in Contonou (Benin)].[对科托努(贝宁)2008年霍乱疫情应对质量的评估]
Sante Publique. 2010 Jul-Aug;22(4):425-35.
2
[Cholera in Benin (epidemic of 1991)].[贝宁的霍乱(1991年疫情)]
Med Trop (Mars). 1993 Jul-Sep;53(3):341-9.
3
Investigation of a cholera outbreak in Ethiopia's Oromiya Region.埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区霍乱疫情调查。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Dec;4(4):312-7. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.44. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
4
[The determinants of the low case fatality rate of the cholera epidemic in the Littoral department of Benin in 2008].
Sante Publique. 2011 Sep-Oct;23(5):345-58.
5
Risk factors for cholera in Pohnpei during an outbreak in 2000: lessons for Pacific countries and territories.2000年波纳佩岛霍乱疫情的风险因素:给太平洋国家和地区的教训
Pac Health Dialog. 2005 Sep;12(2):17-22.
6
[Service quality assurance by death analysis during the 2004 cholera outbreak in Douala].[通过杜阿拉2004年霍乱疫情期间的死亡分析进行服务质量保证]
Sante. 2006 Jul-Sep;16(3):149-54.
7
[The epidemic of cholera in Dahomey].[达荷美(现贝宁)的霍乱疫情]
Med Trop (Mars). 1971 Nov-Dec;31(6):643-63.
8
Recurrent cholera epidemics in Kano--northern Nigeria.尼日利亚北部卡诺市的霍乱疫情反复爆发。
Cent Afr J Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;51(3-4):34-8.
9
A successful response to an outbreak of cholera in Afghanistan.对阿富汗霍乱疫情的成功应对。
Trop Doct. 2008 Jan;38(1):17-20. doi: 10.1258/td.2006.006336.
10
[Large-scale selective antibiotic prophylaxis during the 2004 cholera outbreak in Douala (Cameroon)].[喀麦隆杜阿拉2004年霍乱疫情期间的大规模选择性抗生素预防措施]
Sante. 2007 Apr-Jun;17(2):63-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Profile of community initiatives during the response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Tunisia.突尼斯应对 COVID-19 大流行期间社区倡议的概况。
Tunis Med. 2021 Jan;99(1):168-178.
2
The practice of evaluating epidemic response in humanitarian and low-income settings: a systematic review.在人道主义和低收入环境中评估疫情应对措施的实践:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 3;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01767-8.