Department of Psychology, Nagoya University, Japan.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Dec;78(3):273-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
In this study, we examined whether the feedback-related negativity (FRN) is associated with both subjective and objective (model-estimated) reward prediction errors (RPE) per trial in a reinforcement learning task in healthy adults (n=25). The level of RPE was assessed by 1) subjective ratings per trial and by 2) a computational model of reinforcement learning. As results, model-estimated RPE was highly correlated with subjective RPE (r=.82), and the grand-averaged ERP waves based on the trials with high and low model-estimated RPE showed the significant difference only in the time period of the FRN component (p<.05). Regardless of the time course of learning, FRN was associated with both subjective and model-estimated RPEs within subject (r=.47, p<.001; r=.40, p<.05) and between subjects (r=.33, p<.05; r=.41, p<.005) only in the Learnable condition where the internal reward prediction varied enough with a behavior-reward contingency.
在这项研究中,我们在一项强化学习任务中,检查了健康成年人(n=25)中每一次试验的反馈相关负波(FRN)是否与主观和客观(模型估计)奖励预测误差(RPE)都有关联。RPE 的水平通过以下方式评估:1)每次试验的主观评分和 2)强化学习的计算模型。结果表明,模型估计的 RPE 与主观 RPE 高度相关(r=.82),并且基于模型估计的 RPE 高低的试验的平均 ERP 波仅在 FRN 成分的时间段内显示出显著差异(p<.05)。无论学习的时间进程如何,FRN 仅在可学习条件下,与主观和模型估计的 RPE 之间存在关联,在可学习条件下,内部奖励预测与行为奖励关联的变化足以引起 FRN(个体内 r=.47,p<.001;r=.40,p<.05;个体间 r=.33,p<.05;r=.41,p<.005)。