• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家护理质量指标压疮指标数据库的可靠性测试。

Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, Kan. 66160, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Adm. 2010 Oct;40(10 Suppl):S16-25. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181f37d15.

DOI:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181f37d15
PMID:20859098
Abstract

A criterion-referenced Web-based test was designed and administered to 256 individuals at 48 randomly sampled National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) member hospitals to determine the reliability of the NDNQI pressure ulcer indicator. Overall κ values for pressure ulcer identification, staging, and sourcing indicate moderate to near perfect reliability. Findings suggest that nurses can accurately differentiate pressure ulcers from other ulcerous wounds in Web-based photographs, reliably stage pressure ulcers, and reliably identify community versus nosocomial pressure ulcers.

摘要

一个基于标准的网络测试被设计并应用于 256 名来自 48 家随机抽样的国家护理质量指标数据库(NDNQI)成员医院的个体,以确定 NDNQI 压疮指标的可靠性。压疮识别、分期和来源的整体κ 值表明具有中度到接近完美的可靠性。研究结果表明,护士可以在网络照片中准确区分压疮和其他溃疡性伤口,可靠地分期压疮,并可靠地识别社区性和医院获得性压疮。

相似文献

1
Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.国家护理质量指标压疮指标数据库的可靠性测试。
J Nurs Adm. 2010 Oct;40(10 Suppl):S16-25. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181f37d15.
2
Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.国家护理质量指标数据库压疮指标的可靠性测试
J Nurs Care Qual. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):256-65. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200607000-00011.
3
The reliability of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator: a triangulation approach.国家护理质量指标数据库压疮指标的可靠性:一种三角验证法。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):292-301. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182169452.
4
Explaining the national differences in pressure ulcer prevalence between the Netherlands and Germany--adjusted for personal risk factors and institutional quality indicators.解释荷兰和德国之间压疮患病率的国家差异——根据个人风险因素和机构质量指标进行调整。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00958.x.
5
Inter-rater reliability of pressure ulcer staging: ordinal probit Bayesian hierarchical model that allows for uncertain rater response.压疮分期的评分者间信度:允许评分者反应存在不确定性的有序概率贝叶斯层次模型。
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4602-18. doi: 10.1002/sim.2877.
6
Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.欧洲压疮咨询小组分类系统的可靠性。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Apr;54(2):189-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03801.x.
7
Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.使用照片评估欧洲压力性溃疡咨询小组(EPUAP)压力性溃疡分类系统的评分者间信度。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Nov;13(8):952-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00974.x.
8
Interrater reliability using Modified Norton Scale, Pressure Ulcer Card, Short Form-Mini Nutritional Assessment by registered and enrolled nurses in clinical practice.在临床实践中,由注册护士和在编护士使用改良诺顿量表、压疮卡片、简易微型营养评定法进行的评估者间信度。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(5):618-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02131.x.
9
Critical care nurses' knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention, staging and description.重症监护护士对压疮预防、分期及描述的知识掌握情况。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1997 Mar;43(2):22-6, 28, 30-1.
10
Determining the efficacy of a pressure ulcer prevention program by collecting prevalence and incidence data: a unit-based effort.通过收集患病率和发病率数据来确定压疮预防计划的效果:一项基于单位的工作。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 May;49(5):44-6, 48-51.

引用本文的文献

1
A Feasibility Study of Intermittent Electrical Stimulation to Prevent Deep Tissue Injury in the Intensive Care Unit.间歇性电刺激预防重症监护病房深部组织损伤的可行性研究
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Apr 1;6(4):115-124. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0686.
2
Data Envelopment Analysis in the Presence of Measurement Error: Case Study from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators® (NDNQI®).存在测量误差时的数据包络分析:来自国家护理质量指标数据库(NDNQI®)的案例研究
J Appl Stat. 2012;39(12):2639-2653. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2012.724664. Epub 2012 Sep 18.