School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
J Sports Sci. 2010 Oct;28(12):1319-25. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.504783.
The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of movement intensity and path linearity on global positioning system (GPS) distance validity and reliability. One participant wore eight 1-Hz GPS receivers while walking, jogging, running, and sprinting over linear and non-linear 200-m courses. Five trials were performed at each intensity of movement on each 200-m course. One receiver was excluded from analysis due to errors during data collection. The results from seven GPS receivers showed the mean (± s) and percent bias of the GPS distance values on the 200-m linear course were 205.8 ± 2.4 m (2.8%), 201.8 ± 2.8 m (0.8%), 203.1 ± 2.2 m (1.5%), and 205.2 ± 4 m (2.5%) for the walk, jog, run, and sprint trial respectively. Walk and sprint distances were significantly different from jogging and running distances (P < 0.05). The GPS distance values on the 200-m non-linear course were 198.9 ± 3.5 m (-0.5%), 188.3 ± 2 m (-5.8%), 184.6 ± 2.9 m (-7.7%), and 180.4 ± 5.7 m (-9.8%) for the walk, jog, run, and sprint trial respectively; these were significantly lower than those for the corresponding values on the linear course (P < 0.05). Differences between all non-linear movement intensities were significant (P < 0.05). The overall coefficient of variation within and between receivers was 2.6% and 2.8% respectively. Path linearity and movement intensity appear to affect GPS distance accuracy via inherent positioning errors, update rate, and conditions of use; reliability decreases with movement intensity.
本研究旨在探讨运动强度和路径线性度对全球定位系统(GPS)距离有效性和可靠性的影响。一名参与者在直线和非直线 200 米跑道上行走、慢跑、跑步和冲刺时佩戴了 8 个 1Hz GPS 接收器。每种运动强度在每条 200 米跑道上进行了 5 次试验。由于数据采集过程中的错误,一个接收器被排除在分析之外。从七个 GPS 接收器得出的结果显示,200 米直线跑道上 GPS 距离值的平均值(±s)和偏差百分比分别为:步行试验为 205.8±2.4 米(2.8%),慢跑试验为 201.8±2.8 米(0.8%),跑步试验为 203.1±2.2 米(1.5%),冲刺试验为 205.2±4 米(2.5%)。步行和冲刺距离与慢跑和跑步距离有显著差异(P<0.05)。200 米非直线跑道上的 GPS 距离值分别为:步行试验为 198.9±3.5 米(-0.5%),慢跑试验为 188.3±2 米(-5.8%),跑步试验为 184.6±2.9 米(-7.7%),冲刺试验为 180.4±5.7 米(-9.8%);这些值明显低于直线跑道上相应的距离值(P<0.05)。所有非直线运动强度之间的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。接收器内和接收器间的总体变异系数分别为 2.6%和 2.8%。路径线性度和运动强度似乎通过固有定位误差、更新率和使用条件影响 GPS 距离的准确性;可靠性随运动强度的增加而降低。