Suppr超能文献

族群隔离与精神病:重新审视族群密度效应。

Ethnic isolation and psychosis: re-examining the ethnic density effect.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, Kings College, London UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2011 Jun;41(6):1263-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001649. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elevated incidence of psychotic illness has been consistently shown among migrant populations. Ethnic density, the proportion of an ethnic group in a defined area, is cited as one factor with a reduced risk of psychosis where ethnicity is shared. However, UK studies have shown mixed results. We set out to re-examine the ethnic density effect at a greater level of geographic detail than previous studies.

METHOD

Using a large sample of patient records from general practitioners in South East London, we were able to assess neighbourhood factors at the detailed lower super output area level. This comprises, on average, 1500 people compared with around 6000 per ward, the measure used in previous studies. We compared black (Afro-Caribbean) and white psychosis incidence by neighbourhood ethnic density over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

We found a clear negative association between ethnic density and psychosis incidence. In neighbourhoods where black people comprised more than 25% of the population, there was no longer a statistically significant ethnic difference in psychosis rates. However, where black people were less well represented, their relative risk increased nearly threefold [odds ratio (OR) 2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-4.39]. Furthermore, incidence rates for black people in the lowest density quintiles were over five times greater than in the most dense quintile (OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.95-14.07). However, at ward level this association was much weaker and no longer statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnic density is inversely related to psychosis incidence at a detailed local neighbourhood level.

摘要

背景

移民群体中精神疾病的发病率一直居高不下。族群密度,即一个族群在特定区域的比例,被认为是降低同种族人群精神疾病风险的一个因素。然而,英国的研究结果喜忧参半。我们旨在以比以往研究更详细的地理细节重新检验族群密度效应。

方法

我们利用来自伦敦东南部全科医生的大量患者记录,能够在详细的低级超区层面评估邻里因素。这平均包括 1500 人,而以往研究中使用的措施是每个行政区约 6000 人。我们比较了 10 年间不同邻里族群密度下的黑人(加勒比裔黑人)和白人的精神疾病发病率。

结果

我们发现族群密度与精神疾病发病率之间存在明显的负相关。在黑人占人口比例超过 25%的邻里中,精神疾病发病率不再存在统计学上显著的种族差异。然而,在黑人代表性较低的地区,他们的相对风险增加了近三倍[比值比(OR)2.88,95%置信区间(CI)1.89-4.39]。此外,在族群密度最低的五分位数中,黑人的发病率是族群密度最高的五分位数的五倍多(OR 5.24,95% CI 1.95-14.07)。然而,在行政区层面,这种关联要弱得多,且不再具有统计学意义。

结论

族群密度与精神疾病发病率呈反比,在详细的本地邻里层面上具有相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验