• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

林地热带草原中斑马和角马的群体动态:捕食风险和栖息地密度的影响。

Group dynamics of zebra and wildebeest in a woodland savanna: effects of predation risk and habitat density.

机构信息

School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Sep 20;5(9):e12758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012758.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0012758
PMID:20862216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2942830/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Group dynamics of gregarious ungulates in the grasslands of the African savanna have been well studied, but the trade-offs that affect grouping of these ungulates in woodland habitats or dense vegetation are less well understood. We examined the landscape-level distribution of groups of blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, and Burchell's zebra, Equus burchelli, in a predominantly woodland area (Karongwe Game Reserve, South Africa; KGR) to test the hypothesis that group dynamics are a function of minimizing predation risk from their primary predator, lion, Panthera leo.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using generalized linear models, we examined the relative importance of habitat type (differing in vegetation density), probability of encountering lion (based on utilization distribution of all individual lions in the reserve), and season in predicting group size and composition. We found that only in open scrub habitat, group size for both ungulate species increased with the probability of encountering lion. Group composition differed between the two species and was driven by habitat selection as well as predation risk. For both species, composition of groups was, however, dominated by males in open scrub habitats, irrespective of the probability of encountering lion.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Distribution patterns of wildebeest and zebra groups at the landscape level directly support the theoretical and empirical evidence from a range of taxa predicting that grouping is favored in open habitats and when predation risk is high. Group composition reflected species-specific social, physiological and foraging constraints, as well as the importance of predation risk. Avoidance of high resource open scrub habitat by females can lead to loss of foraging opportunities, which can be particularly costly in areas such as KGR, where this resource is limited. Thus, landscape-level grouping dynamics are species specific and particular to the composition of the group, arising from a tradeoff between maximizing resource selection and minimizing predation risk.

摘要

背景

在非洲大草原的草原上,群居有蹄类动物的群体动态已经得到了很好的研究,但在林地栖息地或茂密植被中影响这些有蹄类动物群体形成的权衡因素却了解较少。我们检查了主要为林地(南非 Karongwe 野生动物保护区;KGR)中蓝角马 Connochaetes taurinus 和斑驴 Equus burchelli 群体的景观水平分布,以检验以下假设:即群体动态是最小化来自其主要捕食者狮子 Panthera leo 的捕食风险的函数。

方法/主要发现:我们使用广义线性模型,检查了栖息地类型(植被密度不同)、遇到狮子的概率(基于保护区内所有个体狮子的利用分布)和季节在预测群体大小和组成方面的相对重要性。我们发现,只有在开阔灌丛栖息地中,两种有蹄类动物的群体大小才会随着遇到狮子的概率增加而增加。群体组成在这两个物种之间存在差异,这是由栖息地选择和捕食风险驱动的。对于这两个物种,在开阔灌丛栖息地中,无论遇到狮子的概率如何,群体组成都以雄性为主。

结论/意义:在景观水平上,角马和斑马群体的分布模式直接支持了从一系列分类单元得出的理论和经验证据,这些证据预测了在开阔栖息地和捕食风险高的情况下,群体形成是有利的。群体组成反映了物种特有的社会、生理和觅食限制,以及捕食风险的重要性。雌性避免高资源开阔灌丛栖息地可能会导致觅食机会的丧失,在像 KGR 这样资源有限的地区,这可能特别昂贵。因此,景观水平的群体动态是特定于物种的,并且与群体的组成有关,这是在最大化资源选择和最小化捕食风险之间的权衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/8733e6cbad8f/pone.0012758.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/fd20e28c1449/pone.0012758.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/bdb79b3a4abd/pone.0012758.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/8733e6cbad8f/pone.0012758.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/fd20e28c1449/pone.0012758.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/bdb79b3a4abd/pone.0012758.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/2942830/8733e6cbad8f/pone.0012758.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Group dynamics of zebra and wildebeest in a woodland savanna: effects of predation risk and habitat density.林地热带草原中斑马和角马的群体动态:捕食风险和栖息地密度的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 20;5(9):e12758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012758.
2
Minimizing predation risk in a landscape of multiple predators: effects on the spatial distribution of African ungulates.最小化多种捕食者景观中的捕食风险:对非洲有蹄类动物空间分布的影响。
Ecology. 2011 Feb;92(2):398-407. doi: 10.1890/10-0126.1.
3
Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use.非洲食草动物针对狮子捕食风险的行为调整:时空变化影响栖息地利用。
Ecology. 2009 Jan;90(1):23-30. doi: 10.1890/08-0606.1.
4
Spatial patterns of African ungulate aggregation reveal complex but limited risk effects from reintroduced carnivores.非洲有蹄类动物聚集的空间模式揭示了重新引入的食肉动物带来的复杂但有限的风险影响。
Ecology. 2016 May;97(5):1123-34. doi: 10.1890/15-0707.1.
5
Zebra diel migrations reduce encounter risk with lions at night.斑马的昼夜迁徙减少了夜间与狮子遭遇的风险。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Jan;88(1):92-101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12910. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Migratory herds of wildebeests and zebras indirectly affect calf survival of giraffes.角马和斑马的迁徙兽群间接影响长颈鹿幼崽的存活。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Oct 25;6(23):8402-8411. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2561. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
To kill, stay or flee: the effects of lions and landscape factors on habitat and kill site selection of cheetahs in South Africa.杀戮、停留还是逃离:狮子和景观因素对南非猎豹栖息地及捕杀地点选择的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0117743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117743. eCollection 2015.
8
Interspecific prey neighborhoods shape risk of predation in a savanna ecosystem.种间猎物邻域塑造了热带稀树草原生态系统中的捕食风险。
Ecology. 2019 Jul;100(7):e02698. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2698. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Resolving a conservation dilemma: Vulnerable lions eating endangered zebras.解决保护困境:脆弱的狮子吃濒危的斑马。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0201983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201983. eCollection 2018.
10
Spatial and temporal changes in group dynamics and range use enable anti-predator responses in African buffalo.群体动态和活动范围的时空变化使非洲野牛能够做出抗捕食反应。
Ecology. 2012 Jun;93(6):1297-304. doi: 10.1890/11-1770.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Zebra Risk Perception in a Landscape of Fear.恐惧情境下的斑马风险认知
Ecol Evol. 2025 May 14;15(5):e71275. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71275. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Identifying the social context of single- and mixed-species group formation in large African herbivores.识别大型非洲草食动物单物种和混合物种群体形成的社会背景。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Jun 5;378(1878):20220105. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0105. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Decline and fall: The causes of group failure in cooperatively breeding meerkats.衰落与覆灭:合作繁殖的狐獴群体失败的原因

本文引用的文献

1
Minimizing predation risk in a landscape of multiple predators: effects on the spatial distribution of African ungulates.最小化多种捕食者景观中的捕食风险:对非洲有蹄类动物空间分布的影响。
Ecology. 2011 Feb;92(2):398-407. doi: 10.1890/10-0126.1.
2
Group-size-mediated habitat selection and group fusion-fission dynamics of bison under predation risk.捕食风险下野牛群体大小介导的栖息地选择与群体融合-分裂动态
Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2480-90. doi: 10.1890/08-0345.1.
3
Home range utilisation and territorial behaviour of lions (Panthera leo) on Karongwe Game Reserve, South Africa.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 12;11(21):14459-14474. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7655. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
The Youngest, the Heaviest and/or the Darkest? Selection Potentialities and Determinants of Leadership in Canarian Dromedary Camels.最年轻、最重和/或最黑?加那利单峰骆驼领导力的选择潜力和决定因素。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 3;11(10):2886. doi: 10.3390/ani11102886.
5
Sociability increases survival of adult female giraffes.社交能力提高成年雌性长颈鹿的存活率。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 10;288(1944):20202770. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2770.
6
Mixed-species groups of Serengeti grazers: a test of the stress gradient hypothesis.塞伦盖蒂食草动物的混合物种群体:压力梯度假说的检验。
Ecology. 2020 Nov;101(11):e03163. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3163. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Fission-fusion dynamics of a megaherbivore are driven by ecological, anthropogenic, temporal, and social factors.大型食草动物的裂变-融合动态受生态、人为、时间和社会因素的驱动。
Oecologia. 2019 Oct;191(2):335-347. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04485-y. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
An unusual association of hadrosaur and therizinosaur tracks within Late Cretaceous rocks of Denali National Park, Alaska.阿拉斯加德纳里国家公园晚白垩世岩石中鸭嘴龙和镰刀龙足迹的不寻常组合。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 3;8(1):11706. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30110-8.
9
Between-gender differences in vigilance do not necessarily lead to differences in foraging-vigilance tradeoffs.警觉性方面的性别差异不一定会导致觅食 - 警觉性权衡的差异。
Oecologia. 2016 Jul;181(3):757-68. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3614-5. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Ecological correlates of group-size variation in a resource-defense ungulate, the sedentary guanaco.资源防御性反刍动物——久坐不动的羊驼的群体大小变化的生态关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089060. eCollection 2014.
南非卡龙韦禁猎区狮子(Panthera leo)的家域利用和领地行为
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003998. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
4
Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator-prey system.景观异质性在一个新恢复的捕食者 - 猎物系统中塑造了捕食行为。
Ecol Lett. 2007 Aug;10(8):690-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01059.x.
5
Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem.放牧生态系统中的猎物风险分配
Ecol Appl. 2006 Feb;16(1):285-98. doi: 10.1890/04-0623.
6
Defining herbivore assemblages in the Kruger National Park: a correlative coherence approach.界定克鲁格国家公园的食草动物群落:一种相关一致性方法。
Oecologia. 2006 Jan;146(4):632-40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0235-9. Epub 2005 Oct 11.
7
Continuous cycling of grouped vs. solitary strategy frequencies in a predator-prey model.捕食者 - 猎物模型中群体与单独策略频率的连续循环
Theor Popul Biol. 2004 May;65(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.10.005.
8
Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions.社会因素对脊椎动物觅食行为的影响:因果机制与适应功能
Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):3-15. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1557.
9
Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints.鱼群组成:机制与限制因素
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 7;267(1456):2011-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1243.