• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杀戮、停留还是逃离:狮子和景观因素对南非猎豹栖息地及捕杀地点选择的影响

To kill, stay or flee: the effects of lions and landscape factors on habitat and kill site selection of cheetahs in South Africa.

作者信息

Rostro-García Susana, Kamler Jan F, Hunter Luke T B

机构信息

Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, United Kingdom.

Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0117743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117743. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0117743
PMID:25693067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4333767/
Abstract

Understanding how animals utilize available space is important for their conservation, as it provides insight into the ecological needs of the species, including those related to habitat, prey and inter and intraspecific interactions. We used 28 months of radio telemetry data and information from 200 kill locations to assess habitat selection at the 3rd order (selection of habitats within home ranges) and 4th order (selection of kill sites within the habitats used) of a reintroduced population of cheetahs Acinonyx jubatus in Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa. Along with landscape characteristics, we investigated if lion Panthera leo presence affected habitat selection of cheetahs. Our results indicated that cheetah habitat selection was driven by a trade-off between resource acquisition and lion avoidance, and the balance of this trade-off varied with scale: more open habitats with high prey densities were positively selected within home ranges, whereas more closed habitats with low prey densities were positively selected for kill sites. We also showed that habitat selection, feeding ecology, and avoidance of lions differed depending on the sex and reproductive status of cheetahs. The results highlight the importance of scale when investigating a species' habitat selection. We conclude that the adaptability of cheetahs, together with the habitat heterogeneity found within Phinda, explained their success in this small fenced reserve. The results provide information for the conservation and management of this threatened species, especially with regards to reintroduction efforts in South Africa.

摘要

了解动物如何利用可用空间对其保护至关重要,因为这能深入了解物种的生态需求,包括与栖息地、猎物以及种间和种内相互作用相关的需求。我们利用了28个月的无线电遥测数据以及来自200个捕杀地点的信息,来评估南非菲达私人野生动物保护区重新引入的猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)种群在第三层级(家域内栖息地的选择)和第四层级(所使用栖息地内捕杀地点的选择)的栖息地选择情况。除了景观特征外,我们还研究了狮子(Panthera leo)的存在是否会影响猎豹的栖息地选择。我们的结果表明,猎豹的栖息地选择是由资源获取和躲避狮子之间的权衡驱动的,这种权衡的平衡随尺度而变化:家域内积极选择猎物密度高的更开阔栖息地,而捕杀地点则积极选择猎物密度低的更封闭栖息地。我们还表明,猎豹的栖息地选择、觅食生态以及对狮子的躲避因性别和繁殖状态而异。结果突出了在研究物种栖息地选择时尺度的重要性。我们得出结论,猎豹的适应性以及菲达内发现的栖息地异质性解释了它们在这个小型围栏保护区取得成功的原因。这些结果为这种濒危物种的保护和管理提供了信息,特别是在南非的重新引入工作方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da44/4333767/6fe8efc1c7c1/pone.0117743.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da44/4333767/1b444190163d/pone.0117743.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da44/4333767/6fe8efc1c7c1/pone.0117743.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da44/4333767/1b444190163d/pone.0117743.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da44/4333767/6fe8efc1c7c1/pone.0117743.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
To kill, stay or flee: the effects of lions and landscape factors on habitat and kill site selection of cheetahs in South Africa.杀戮、停留还是逃离:狮子和景观因素对南非猎豹栖息地及捕杀地点选择的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0117743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117743. eCollection 2015.
2
Cheetahs and wild dogs show contrasting patterns of suppression by lions.猎豹和野狗在狮子的压制下呈现出截然不同的模式。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Nov;83(6):1418-27. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12231. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Risk avoidance in sympatric large carnivores: reactive or predictive?同域大型食肉动物的风险规避:反应性还是预测性?
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1098-105. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12077. Epub 2013 May 20.
4
Isolation of Bartonella henselae, Bartonella koehlerae subsp. koehlerae, Bartonella koehlerae subsp. bothieri and a new subspecies of B. koehlerae from free-ranging lions (Panthera leo) from South Africa, cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) from Namibia and captive cheetahs from California.从南非的野生狮子( Panthera leo )、纳米比亚的猎豹( Acinonyx jubatus )以及加利福尼亚的圈养猎豹中分离出亨氏巴尔通体、科氏巴尔通体科氏亚种、科氏巴尔通体博氏亚种和一种新的科氏巴尔通体亚种。
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Nov;144(15):3237-3243. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816001394. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
Prevalence of Bartonella infection in wild African lions (Panthera leo) and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus).野生非洲狮(Panthera leo)和猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)巴尔通体感染的患病率
Vet Microbiol. 2004 May 20;100(1-2):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.01.007.
6
Effects of Vegetation Structure on the Location of Lion Kill Sites in African Thicket.植被结构对非洲灌木丛中狮子捕杀地点位置的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149098. eCollection 2016.
7
In the absence of a "landscape of fear": How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist.在没有“恐惧景观”的情况下:狮子、鬣狗和猎豹如何共存。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 6;6(23):8534-8545. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2569. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
Behavior-specific habitat selection by African lions may promote their persistence in a human-dominated landscape.非洲狮的特定行为栖息地选择可能有助于它们在以人类为主导的景观中生存。
Ecology. 2019 Apr;100(4):e02644. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2644. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Living on the edge: Multiscale habitat selection by cheetahs in a human-wildlife landscape.边缘生存:人类与野生动物共存景观中猎豹的多尺度栖息地选择
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 9;8(15):7611-7623. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4269. eCollection 2018 Aug.
10
Spatial patterns of African ungulate aggregation reveal complex but limited risk effects from reintroduced carnivores.非洲有蹄类动物聚集的空间模式揭示了重新引入的食肉动物带来的复杂但有限的风险影响。
Ecology. 2016 May;97(5):1123-34. doi: 10.1890/15-0707.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping illegal trade routes of live cheetahs from the Horn of Africa to the Arabian Peninsula.追踪从非洲之角到阿拉伯半岛的猎豹非法贸易路线。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Jun;39(3):e14412. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14412. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Dietary similarity among jaguars (Panthera onca) in a high-density population.高密度美洲虎( Panthera onca )种群的饮食相似性。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0274891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274891. eCollection 2022.
3
Diet and prey selection of clouded leopards and tigers in Laos.老挝云豹和老虎的饮食及猎物选择

本文引用的文献

1
Interspecific Killing among Mammalian Carnivores.哺乳动物食肉动物之间的种间杀戮。
Am Nat. 1999 May;153(5):492-508. doi: 10.1086/303189.
2
Quantitative measurement of food selection : A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index.食物选择的定量测量:饲料比例和伊夫列夫选择性指数的一种改进方法。
Oecologia. 1974 Dec;14(4):413-417. doi: 10.1007/BF00384581.
3
Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores.为了原地不动而迁移:非洲大型食肉动物共存的行为机制。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e9067. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9067. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Assessing Asiatic cheetah's individual diet using metabarcoding and its implication for conservation.利用代谢组学评估亚洲猎豹的个体饮食及其对保护的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 6;12(1):11403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15065-1.
5
Global Warming and Its Implications on Nature Tourism at Phinda Private Game Reserve, South Africa.全球变暖及其对南非 Phinda 私人野生动物保护区自然旅游的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 30;19(9):5487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095487.
6
Small cats in big trouble? Diet, activity, and habitat use of jungle cats and leopard cats in threatened dry deciduous forests, Cambodia.小型猫科动物陷入大麻烦?柬埔寨受威胁的干燥落叶林中丛林猫和豹猫的饮食、活动及栖息地利用情况
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 30;11(9):4205-4217. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7316. eCollection 2021 May.
7
Habitat complexity and lifetime predation risk influence mesopredator survival in a multi-predator system.生境复杂性和终生捕食风险影响多捕食者系统中中型捕食者的生存。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 20;10(1):17841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73318-3.
8
Natural and anthropogenic drivers of cub recruitment in a large carnivore.大型食肉动物幼崽招募的自然和人为驱动因素
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun 17;8(13):6748-6755. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4180. eCollection 2018 Jul.
9
An adaptable but threatened big cat: density, diet and prey selection of the Indochinese leopard () in eastern Cambodia.一种适应性强但受到威胁的大型猫科动物:柬埔寨东部印支豹()的密度、饮食与猎物选择
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Feb 7;5(2):171187. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171187. eCollection 2018 Feb.
10
In the absence of a "landscape of fear": How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist.在没有“恐惧景观”的情况下:狮子、鬣狗和猎豹如何共存。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 6;6(23):8534-8545. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2569. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Ecology. 2013 Nov;94(11):2619-31. doi: 10.1890/13-0217.1.
4
Creating larger and better connected protected areas enhances the persistence of big game species in the maputaland-pondoland-albany biodiversity hotspot.建立更大和更连通的保护区可以提高马普托-蓬多兰-奥尔巴尼生物多样性热点地区大型猎物物种的持续存在。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e71788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071788. eCollection 2013.
5
Risk avoidance in sympatric large carnivores: reactive or predictive?同域大型食肉动物的风险规避:反应性还是预测性?
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1098-105. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12077. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large African carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity.人工和自然屏障对大型非洲食肉动物的影响比较:对种间关系和连通性的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 May;82(3):707-15. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12039. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Minimizing predation risk in a landscape of multiple predators: effects on the spatial distribution of African ungulates.最小化多种捕食者景观中的捕食风险:对非洲有蹄类动物空间分布的影响。
Ecology. 2011 Feb;92(2):398-407. doi: 10.1890/10-0126.1.
8
Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions.生态学和进化中的多模型推断:挑战与解决方案。
J Evol Biol. 2011 Apr;24(4):699-711. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02210.x. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
9
Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use.非洲食草动物针对狮子捕食风险的行为调整:时空变化影响栖息地利用。
Ecology. 2009 Jan;90(1):23-30. doi: 10.1890/08-0606.1.
10
Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?与狼的干扰竞争是否限制了郊狼的分布和数量?
J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1075-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.x.