Energy and Bioscience Institute, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Biodegradation. 2011 Apr;22(2):431-44. doi: 10.1007/s10532-010-9416-2. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
Isotope fractionation has been used with increasing frequency as a tool to quantify degradation of chlorinated aliphatic pollutants in the environment. The objective of this research was to determine if the electron donor present in enrichment cultures prepared from uncontaminated sediments influenced the extent of isotope fractionation of tetrachloroethylene (PCE), either directly, or through its influence on microbial community composition. Two PCE-degrading enrichment cultures were prepared from Duck Pond (DP) sediment and were incubated with formate (DPF) or H(2) (DPH) as electron donor. DPF and DPH were significantly different in both product distribution and extent of isotope fractionation. Chemical and isotope analyses indicated that electron donors did not directly affect the product distribution or the extent of isotope fractionation for PCE reductive dechlorination. Instead, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA clone libraries of DPF and DPH identified distinct microbial communities in each enrichment culture, suggesting that differences in microbial communities were responsible for distinct product distributions and isotope fractionation between the two cultures. A dominant species identified only in DPH was closely related to known dehalogenating species (Sulfurospirillum multivorans and Sulfurospirillum halorespirans) and may be responsible for PCE degradation in DPH. Our study suggests that different dechlorinators exist at the same site and can be preferentially stimulated by different electron donors, especially over the long-term (i.e., years), typical of in-situ ground water remediation.
同位素分馏已被越来越多地用作量化环境中氯化脂肪族污染物降解的工具。本研究的目的是确定来自未受污染沉积物的富集培养物中存在的电子供体是否直接影响或通过其对微生物群落组成的影响来影响四氯乙烯(PCE)的同位素分馏程度。从 Duck Pond (DP) 沉积物中制备了两种 PCE 降解富集培养物,并分别用甲酸盐 (DPF) 或 H(2) (DPH) 作为电子供体进行培养。DPF 和 DPH 在产物分布和同位素分馏程度上均有显著差异。化学和同位素分析表明,电子供体不会直接影响 PCE 还原脱氯的产物分布或同位素分馏程度。相反,DPF 和 DPH 的限制性片段长度多态性 (RFLP) 和 16S rRNA 克隆文库的序列分析确定了每个富集培养物中独特的微生物群落,表明微生物群落的差异是导致两种培养物之间产物分布和同位素分馏不同的原因。仅在 DPH 中鉴定出的一个优势种与已知的脱卤物种(Sulfurospirillum multivorans 和 Sulfurospirillum halorespirans)密切相关,可能是 DPH 中 PCE 降解的原因。我们的研究表明,在同一地点存在不同的脱氯剂,并且可以通过不同的电子供体优先刺激,特别是在原位地下水修复的长期(即数年)中。