Mathematical Biosciences Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Nov;25(11):626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
Phylogeographic methods facilitate inference of the geographical history of genetic lineages. Recent examples explore human migration and the origins of viral pandemics. There is longstanding disagreement over the use and validity of certain phylogeographic inference methodologies. In this paper, we highlight three distinct frameworks for phylogeographic inference to give a taste of this disagreement. Each of the three approaches presents a different viewpoint on phylogeography, most fundamentally on how we view the relationship between the inferred history of a sample and the history of the population the sample is embedded in. Satisfactory resolution of this relationship between history of the tree and history of the population remains a challenge for all but the most trivial models of phylogeographic processes. Intriguingly, we believe that some recent methods that entirely avoid inference about the history of the population will eventually help to reach a resolution.
系统发生地理学方法有助于推断遗传谱系的地理历史。最近的一些例子探讨了人类的迁移和病毒大流行的起源。关于某些系统发生地理学推断方法的使用和有效性一直存在争议。在本文中,我们强调了三种不同的系统发生地理学推断框架,以了解这种分歧。这三种方法中的每一种都对系统发生地理学提出了不同的观点,最根本的是对我们如何看待样本推断历史与样本所嵌入的种群历史之间的关系的看法。除了最琐碎的系统发生过程模型外,对于这种树的历史和种群的历史之间的关系的令人满意的解决仍然是一个挑战。有趣的是,我们相信,一些最近完全避免推断种群历史的方法最终将有助于达成解决方案。