• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种创新的抗菌手术手套技术,以降低术中穿孔后微生物穿透的风险。

Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2011 Mar;39(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.026.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.026
PMID:20864217
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical gloves provide a protective barrier for patients and members of the surgical team. Although glove integrity is important in an era of blood-borne pathogens, little data exist on bacterial passage after glove perforation. This study evaluated the impact of antimicrobial surgical gloves in reducing microbial passage after glove puncture in a model of wound contamination.

METHODS

Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and Brevundimonas diminuta (DSM 1639) were used to prepare a standardized suspension for testing bacterial passage after glove puncture in volunteers wearing single-layer gloves (group A), double-layer gloves (group B), or antimicrobial trilayer gloves (group C). After exposure periods of 5, 10, 30 and 45 minutes, the outer test gloves were removed and microbial passage was measured on the inner surface of the base gloves. Multiple repetitions (5 or 6) were performed at each sampling time.

RESULTS

Microbial passage at 5-, 10-, 30-, and 45-minute exposures were analyzed both separately and combined (5 and 10 minutes and 30 and 45 minutes). No difference was observed in microbial passage between group A and group B at the 10-, 30-, and 45-minute exposures for S aureus, whereas a significant reduction in microbial passage was observed in group C compared with group A (P ≤ .05 to < .005) at the 5-, 30-, and 45-minute exposures for both S aureus and B diminuta. When timed groups were combined (5 and 10 minutes and 30 and 45 minutes), a significant reduction (P ≤ .01 to ≤ .005) in microbial passage of S aureus and B diminuta was observed in group C compared with both group A and group B.

CONCLUSION

These findings represent the first evidence that microbial passage across surgical gloves can be reduced significantly using an innovative antimicrobial glove technology.

摘要

背景

手术手套为患者和手术团队成员提供了一道保护屏障。虽然在血源性病原体时代,手套完整性很重要,但手套穿孔后细菌穿透的数据很少。本研究评估了抗菌手术手套在污染伤口模型中减少手套穿孔后微生物穿透的影响。

方法

使用金黄色葡萄球菌(ATCC 6538)和寡养单胞菌(DSM 1639)制备标准化悬浮液,用于测试志愿者在单层手套(A 组)、双层手套(B 组)或抗菌三层手套(C 组)下穿孔后手套的细菌穿透。暴露 5、10、30 和 45 分钟后,取出外层测试手套,测量基础手套内表面的微生物穿透。在每个采样时间重复多次(5 或 6 次)。

结果

分别和组合(5 分钟和 10 分钟以及 30 分钟和 45 分钟)分析了 5、10、30 和 45 分钟暴露时的微生物穿透。在 10、30 和 45 分钟暴露时,A 组和 B 组之间的微生物穿透没有差异,但与 A 组相比,C 组在 5、30 和 45 分钟暴露时的微生物穿透显著减少(P≤.05 至<.005)金黄色葡萄球菌和 B diminuta。当组合定时组(5 分钟和 10 分钟以及 30 分钟和 45 分钟)时,与 A 组和 B 组相比,C 组金黄色葡萄球菌和 B diminuta 的微生物穿透显著减少(P≤.01 至≤.005)。

结论

这些发现首次证明,使用创新的抗菌手套技术可以显著减少手术手套的微生物穿透。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation.评估一种创新的抗菌手术手套技术,以降低术中穿孔后微生物穿透的风险。
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Mar;39(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.026.
2
Evaluation of an antimicrobial surgical glove to inactivate live human immunodeficiency virus following simulated glove puncture.评价一种抗菌手术手套在模拟手套刺破后使活的人体免疫缺陷病毒失活的效果。
Surgery. 2013 Feb;153(2):225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.034. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
3
Use of surgical pass trays to reduce intraoperative glove perforations.使用手术传递托盘以减少术中手套穿孔。
J Matern Fetal Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;6(4):245-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199707/08)6:4<245::AID-MFM12>3.0.CO;2-D.
4
Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves.手术手套穿刺孔处细菌的浓度。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
5
[Defects in the surgical glove barrier. Single or double gloves].[手术手套屏障的缺陷。单层或双层手套]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Mar 3;165(10):1016-9.
6
[What is the appropriate time-interval for changing gloves during surgical procedures].
Zentralbl Chir. 2010 Feb;135(1):25-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224684. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
7
Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.妇科手术中手套穿孔的频率及双层手套的防护效果
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Jun;268(2):82-4. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0343-2. Epub 2002 Aug 28.
8
Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.无菌抗菌聚异戊二烯手术手套在模拟使用2小时后对暂居菌的抗菌活性。
BMC Surg. 2015 Jul 4;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0058-5.
9
Intraoperative contamination of synthetic vascular grafts. Effect of glove change before graft implantation. A prospective randomised study.人工血管移植物的术中污染。植入移植物前更换手套的影响。一项前瞻性随机研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Mar;19(3):283-7. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1035.
10
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].[手术手套——它们对感染的防护效果如何?]
Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403.

引用本文的文献

1
S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene.S2k指南:手部消毒与手部卫生
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Sep 6;19:Doc42. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000497. eCollection 2024.
2
Performance-Enhancing Materials in Medical Gloves.医用手套中的性能增强材料。
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Jun 30;14(7):349. doi: 10.3390/jfb14070349.
3
Damages with High Consequences: Analysis of Perforations in Surgical Latex Operation Gloves from Orthopedic Surgeries.具有严重后果的损伤:骨科手术中外科乳胶手术手套穿孔情况分析
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2018 Nov 26;8(4):159-162. doi: 10.1556/1886.2018.00028. eCollection 2018 Dec 23.
4
Prospective data collection and analysis of perforations and tears of latex surgical gloves during primary endoprosthetic surgeries.初次假体植入手术中乳胶手术手套穿孔和撕裂的前瞻性数据收集与分析。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016 Dec 20;11:Doc25. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000285. eCollection 2016.
5
Antimicrobial efficacy of preoperative skin antisepsis and clonal relationship to postantiseptic skin-and-wound flora in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery.接受清洁骨科手术患者术前皮肤消毒的抗菌效果及与消毒后皮肤和伤口菌群的克隆关系
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;34(11):2265-73. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2478-7. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
6
Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.无菌抗菌聚异戊二烯手术手套在模拟使用2小时后对暂居菌的抗菌活性。
BMC Surg. 2015 Jul 4;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0058-5.