Suppr超能文献

分娩硬膜外镇痛中自动间歇性小剂量推注与持续输注的比较。

Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia.

作者信息

Lim Y, Chakravarty S, Ocampo C E, Sia A T

机构信息

Department of Women's Anaesthesia, Kandang Kerbau Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Sep;38(5):894-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800514.

Abstract

Delivery of local anaesthetics via automated intermittent bolus has been shown to improve epidural analgesia compared to delivery via continuous epidural infusion. However the optimal bolus volume has not been investigated. This randomised, double-blind study compared the analgesic efficacy of automated intermittent bolus (volume 2.5 ml every 15 minutes) with that of a continuous epidural infusion (10 ml/hour) for the maintenance of labour epidural analgesia, to determine whether the advantages previously demonstrated for automated intermittent bolus over continuous epidural infusion are retained at this low bolus volume. With the approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee, we recruited 50 parturients who received combined spinal epidural analgesia with intrathecal ropivacaine 2 mg and fentanyl 15 microg. For epidural maintenance, participants were randomised to either the automated intermittent bolus group (2.5 ml automated intermittent epidural boluses of ropivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 2 microg/ml delivered over a two-minute period every 15 minutes) or the continuous epidural infusion group (continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% plus fentanyl 2 microg/ml at 10 ml/hour). The primary study outcome was the incidence of pain during labour that required management with supplemental epidural analgesia. There were no significant differences between the two regimens in terms of breakthrough pain (automated intermittent bolus 36% [9/25] vs continuous epidural infusion 32% [8/25], P = 0.77). At the doses used in this study, maintenance of labour analgesia using automated intermittent bolus at a bolus volume of 2.5 ml every 15 minutes does not decrease the incidence of breakthrough pain or improve analgesic efficacy compared to continuous epidural infusion.

摘要

与持续硬膜外输注相比,通过自动间歇性推注给予局部麻醉药已被证明可改善硬膜外镇痛效果。然而,最佳推注量尚未得到研究。这项随机、双盲研究比较了自动间歇性推注(每15分钟2.5毫升)与持续硬膜外输注(10毫升/小时)用于维持分娩硬膜外镇痛的镇痛效果,以确定在这种低推注量下,之前所证明的自动间歇性推注相对于持续硬膜外输注的优势是否依然存在。经医院伦理委员会批准,我们招募了50名接受腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛的产妇,鞘内注射2毫克罗哌卡因和15微克芬太尼。对于硬膜外维持镇痛,参与者被随机分为自动间歇性推注组(每15分钟在两分钟内自动间歇性硬膜外推注0.1%罗哌卡因加2微克/毫升芬太尼2.5毫升)或持续硬膜外输注组(以10毫升/小时的速度持续硬膜外输注0.1%罗哌卡因加2微克/毫升芬太尼)。主要研究结局是分娩期间需要补充硬膜外镇痛处理的疼痛发生率。两种方案在突破性疼痛方面无显著差异(自动间歇性推注组为36%[9/25],持续硬膜外输注组为32%[8/25],P = 0.77)。在本研究使用的剂量下,与持续硬膜外输注相比,每15分钟以2.5毫升的推注量采用自动间歇性推注维持分娩镇痛并不能降低突破性疼痛的发生率或提高镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验