Sasaki I, Morihana T, Kaneko A, Michi K, Takahashi K, Fukuoka F, Satoh T, Yoshinari N, Ohne M, Hara H
Department of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine, Tokai University.
Jpn J Antibiot. 1990 Dec;43(12):2035-68.
To evaluate objectively clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of cefuroxime axetil (CXM-AX) in acute dental infections (periodontitis, pericoronitis and gnathitis), we carried out a comparison study using cefaclor (CCL) as the control. Both drugs were orally given after meals in a dose level of 250 mg (potency) t.i.d. for 3-7 days. 1. Clinical efficacy rates in all the treated cases were 81.6% (102/125) in the CXM-AX group and 82.5% (104/126) in the CCL group according to the assessment by physicians in charge, and 89.6% (112/125) and 83.3% (105/126), respectively, according to the assessment based on scores. No significant difference was found between the 2 treatment groups. In clinical efficacy (assessment by score) classified by background factors, efficacy rate in the CXM-AX group (90.6%, 58/64) was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than that in the CCL group (75.0%, 48/64) in cases receiving no surgical treatment on the first day of drug administration. Other background factors than the above (no surgical treatment) factor or scores on the first day of drug administration, however, did not appear to influence clinical efficacies of 2 treatment groups. 2. As for the bacteriological response in all the treated cases, elimination rate in the CXM-AX group was 73.7% (28/38) and that in the CCL group, 78.3% (36/46), without significant difference between the 2 groups. 3. Regarding the safety, no significant difference was found between the 2 treatment groups. Adverse reactions were observed in 1 out of 128 cases (0.8%) in the CXM-AX group and 6 out of 132 cases (4.5%) in the CCL group. Abnormal laboratory test values were noted in 8 out of 86 cases (9.3%) in the CXM-AX group and 5 out of 91 cases (5.5%) in the CCL group. None of these differences between 2 treatment groups was statistically significant. 4. Usefulness rates in all the treated cases were 81.6% (102/125) in the CXM-AX group and 81.7% (103/126) in the CCL group, thus significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. From the above results, CXM-AX is considered to be a useful drug like CCL in the treatment of acute dental infections.
为客观评估头孢呋辛酯(CXM-AX)治疗急性牙齿感染(牙周炎、冠周炎和齿龈炎)的临床疗效、安全性及实用性,我们开展了一项以头孢克洛(CCL)作为对照的比较研究。两种药物均于餐后口服,剂量为250mg(效价),每日3次,疗程3 - 7天。1. 根据主管医生评估,CXM-AX组所有治疗病例的临床有效率为81.6%(102/125),CCL组为82.5%(104/126);根据评分评估,两组分别为89.6%(112/125)和83.3%(105/126)。两组间未发现显著差异。在按背景因素分类的临床疗效(评分评估)方面,给药第一天未接受手术治疗的病例中,CXM-AX组的有效率(90.6%,58/64)显著高于CCL组(75.0%,48/64)(P小于0.05)。然而,除上述(未接受手术治疗)因素或给药第一天的评分外,其他背景因素似乎并未影响两组的临床疗效。2. 在所有治疗病例的细菌学反应方面,CXM-AX组的清除率为73.7%(28/38),CCL组为78.3%(36/46),两组间无显著差异。3. 在安全性方面,两组间未发现显著差异。CXM-AX组128例中有1例(0.8%)出现不良反应,CCL组132例中有6例(4.5%)出现不良反应。CXM-AX组86例中有8例(9.3%)实验室检查值异常,CCL组91例中有5例(5.5%)出现异常。两组间的这些差异均无统计学意义。4. 所有治疗病例的实用性率,CXM-AX组为81.6%(102/125),CCL组为81.7%(103/126),两组间观察到显著差异。从上述结果来看,在治疗急性牙齿感染方面,CXM-AX被认为是一种与CCL一样有用的药物。