Suppr超能文献

鼠乳腺肿瘤细胞和 CD11c(+)树突状细胞对脂多糖的反应不同,并表现出 TLR4 信号通路所需基因的差异表达。

Murine mammary carcinoma cells and CD11c(+) dendritic cells elicit distinct responses to lipopolysaccharide and exhibit differential expression of genes required for TLR4 signaling.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA.

出版信息

Cell Immunol. 2010;266(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.08.015.

Abstract

Although TLR are often studied on DC because of their ability to bridge innate and adaptive defenses, TLR are also expressed by epithelial cells. Because the majority of cancers are carcinomas, and thus of epithelial origin, we wanted to know whether a carcinoma and DC responded similarly to a TLR agonist. We found the mammary carcinoma 4T1 and CD11c(+) DC both secreted proinflammatory chemokines in response to the TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However a clear dichotomy existed. DC, but not 4T1 secreted IL-1β, TNF-α, and upregulated CD80 and CD86 expression following LPS treatment. A potential reason for differential responsiveness was that DC expressed greater levels of TLR4, CD14, Myd88, and TRAM. Despite the low level of TLR signaling proteins, the carcinoma were able to elicit a range of responses contingent upon the source, dose, length, and frequency of TLR agonist treatment. Thus, carcinoma and DC are distinctly responsive to LPS.

摘要

尽管 TLR 因其能够桥接先天和适应性防御而经常在 DC 上进行研究,但 TLR 也在上皮细胞中表达。由于大多数癌症是癌,因此来源于上皮,我们想知道癌和 DC 是否对 TLR 激动剂有类似的反应。我们发现乳腺腺癌 4T1 和 CD11c(+) DC 在 TLR4 激动剂脂多糖 (LPS)的刺激下均分泌促炎趋化因子。然而,存在明显的二分法。在 LPS 处理后,DC 但不是 4T1 分泌 IL-1β、TNF-α 并上调 CD80 和 CD86 的表达。差异反应的一个潜在原因是 DC 表达更高水平的 TLR4、CD14、Myd88 和 TRAM。尽管 TLR 信号蛋白水平较低,但癌能够根据 TLR 激动剂治疗的来源、剂量、持续时间和频率引发一系列反应。因此,癌和 DC 对 LPS 的反应明显不同。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验