Center for Microbial Biotechnology, Building 223, Institute for Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
J Chromatogr A. 2010 Oct 29;1217(44):6905-16. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.08.069. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
In this study we show how low temperature glow discharge plasma can be used to prepare bi-layered chromatography adsorbents with non-adsorptive exteriors. The commercial strong anion exchange expanded bed chromatography matrix, Q HyperZ, was treated with plasmas in one of two general ways. Using a purpose-designed rotating reactor, plasmas were employed to either: (i) remove anion exchange ligands at or close to the exterior surface of Q HyperZ, and replace them with polar oxygen containing functions ('plasma etching and oxidation'); or (ii) bury the same surface exposed ligands beneath thin polymer coatings ('plasma polymerization coating') using appropriate monomers (vinyl acetate, vinyl pyrrolidone, safrole) and argon as the carrier gas. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis (first ∼10 nm depth) of Q HyperZ before and after the various plasma treatments confirmed that substantial changes to the elemental composition of Q HyperZ's exterior had been inflicted in all cases. The atomic percent changes in carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, yttrium and zirconium observed after being exposed to air plasma etching were entirely consistent with: the removal of pendant Q (trimethylammonium) functions; increased exposure of the underlying yttrium-stabilised zirconia shell; and introduction of hydroxyl and carbonyl functions. Following plasma polymerization treatments (with all three monomers tested), the increased atomic percent levels of carbon and parallel drops in nitrogen, yttrium and zirconium provided clear evidence that thin polymer coats had been created at the exteriors of Q HyperZ adsorbent particles. No changes in adsorbent size and surface morphology, nor any evidence of plasma-induced damage could be discerned from scanning electron micrographs, light micrographs and measurements of particle size distributions following 3 h exposure to air (220 V; 35.8 W L(-1)) or 'vinyl acetate/argon' (170 V; 16.5 W L(-1)) plasmas. Losses in bulk chloride exchange capacity before and after exposure to plasmas enabled effective modification depths within hydrated Q HyperZ adsorbent particles to be calculated as 0.2-1.2 μm, depending on the conditions applied. The depth of plasma induced alteration was strongly influenced by the power input and size of the treated batch, i.e. dropping the power or increasing the batch size resulted in reduced plasma penetration and therefore shallower modification. The selectivity of 'surface vs. core' modification imparted to Q HyperZ by the various plasma treatments was evaluated in static and dynamic binding studies employing appropriate probes, i.e. plasmid DNA, sonicated calf thymus DNA and bovine serum albumin. In static binding studies performed with adsorbents that had been exposed to plasmas at the 5 g scale (25 g L(-1) of plasma reactor), the highest 'surface/core' modification selectivity was observed for Q HyperZ that had been subjected to 3 h of air plasma etching at 220 V (35.8 W L(-1)). This treatment removed ∼53% of 'surface' DNA binding at the expense of a 9.3% loss in 'core' protein binding. Even more impressive results were obtained in dynamic expanded bed adsorption studies conducted with Q HyperZ adsorbents that had been treated with air (220 V, 3 h) and 'vinyl acetate/argon' (170 V, 3 h) plasmas at 10.5 g scale (52.5 g L(-1) of plasma reactor). Following both plasma treatments: the 10% breakthrough capacities of the modified Q HyperZ adsorbents towards 'surface' binding DNA probes dropped very significantly (30-85%); the DNA induced inter-particle cross-linking and contraction of expanded beds observed during application of sonicated DNA on native Q HyperZ was completely eradicated; but the 'core' protein binding performance remained unchanged cf. that of the native Q HyperZ starting material.
在这项研究中,我们展示了如何使用低温辉光放电等离子体来制备具有非吸附性外表面的双层层析吸附剂。商业强阴离子交换膨胀床色谱基质 Q HyperZ 采用两种一般方法之一进行等离子体处理。使用专门设计的旋转反应器,等离子体可以:(i) 去除 Q HyperZ 外表面或接近外表面的阴离子交换配体,并将其替换为含有极性氧的功能基团(“等离子体蚀刻和氧化”);或 (ii) 使用适当的单体(醋酸乙烯酯、醋酸乙烯酯、 safrole)和氩气作为载气,在相同的表面暴露配体下形成薄聚合物涂层(“等离子体聚合涂层”)。X 射线光电子能谱分析(最初约 10nm 深度)表明,在所有情况下,Q HyperZ 的外表面的元素组成都发生了实质性的变化。在暴露于空气等离子体蚀刻后观察到的碳、氮、氧、钇和锆的原子百分比变化完全与以下情况一致:Q(三甲基铵)功能的去除;增加了下面的钇稳定氧化锆壳的暴露;以及羟基和羰基功能的引入。经过等离子体聚合处理(测试了所有三种单体)后,碳的原子百分比水平增加,氮、钇和锆的原子百分比水平平行下降,这清楚地表明在 Q HyperZ 吸附剂颗粒的外表面形成了薄聚合物涂层。在暴露于空气(220V;35.8W L(-1))或“醋酸乙烯酯/氩气”(170V;16.5W L(-1))等离子体 3 小时后,扫描电子显微镜、明场显微镜和粒径分布测量均未发现吸附剂尺寸和表面形貌发生变化,也未发现等离子体诱导损伤的证据。在暴露于等离子体前后,体积氯交换容量的损失使得能够计算在水合 Q HyperZ 吸附剂颗粒内的有效改性深度为 0.2-1.2μm,具体取决于应用的条件。等离子体诱导改变的深度强烈受到输入功率和处理批次大小的影响,即降低功率或增加批次大小会导致等离子体穿透减少,从而导致改性较浅。各种等离子体处理赋予 Q HyperZ 的“表面与核心”改性的选择性在使用适当探针的静态和动态结合研究中进行了评估,即质粒 DNA、超声小牛胸腺 DNA 和牛血清白蛋白。在对在 5g 规模(等离子体反应器中 25g L(-1))下暴露于等离子体的吸附剂进行的静态结合研究中,观察到 Q HyperZ 具有最高的“表面/核心”改性选择性,该吸附剂经过 220V(35.8W L(-1)) 的空气等离子体蚀刻处理 3 小时。这种处理去除了约 53%的“表面”DNA 结合,而“核心”蛋白质结合损失了 9.3%。在对在 10.5g 规模(等离子体反应器中 52.5g L(-1))下用空气(220V,3h)和“醋酸乙烯酯/氩气”(170V,3h)等离子体处理的 Q HyperZ 吸附剂进行的动态膨胀床吸附研究中,获得了更为显著的结果。经过两种等离子体处理后:改性 Q HyperZ 吸附剂对“表面”结合 DNA 探针的 10%突破容量显著下降(30-85%);在应用超声 DNA 时观察到的 DNA 诱导的颗粒间交联和膨胀床收缩完全消除;但“核心”蛋白质结合性能保持不变,与起始的天然 Q HyperZ 材料相比。