Department of Surgery, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):984-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
"Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections" (CR-BSIs) is one of the patient safety indicators (PSI 7) developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to screen for potential safety events. We sought to investigate the validity of this PSI using the medical record as the gold standard.
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of all hospitalization records that met the criteria for PSI 7 within Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals from fiscal years 2003 to 2007. Trained abstractors used a standardized abstraction tool to review electronic medical records for the presence of a CR-BSI and the clinical circumstances surrounding the event. We determined the validity of this PSI by calculating its positive predictive value (PPV), and analyzed both true and false positive cases.
Of 112 reviewed cases, 42 were true events of CR-BSIs, yielding a PPV of 38% (95% CI 29% to 47%). Seventy cases were false positives; these were attributed to correct ICD-9-CM codes but had diagnoses that fell outside the scope of the indicator (n = 28, 40%), coding inaccuracies (n = 21, 30%); and present on admission (POA) diagnoses (n = 21; 30%). Among the 42 patients with CR-BSIs, catheters were left in place for an average of 11 days, and 20% (n = 8) were placed in the femoral position.
PSI 7 has relatively poor predictive ability for identifying true events. Coding-related issues were the main reason for the low PPV. Implementing POA codes and using more specific ICD-9-CM codes would improve its validity. As it currently stands, PSI 7 should not be used as a pay-for-performance measure, but should be limited to use in internal quality improvement efforts.
“中心静脉导管相关血流感染”(CR-BSI)是医疗保健研究与质量署(AHRQ)开发的患者安全指标(PSI 7)之一,用于筛选潜在的安全事件。我们试图使用病历作为金标准来验证该 PSI 的有效性。
我们对 2003 年至 2007 年期间退伍军人健康管理局(VA)医院中符合 PSI 7 标准的所有住院记录进行了回顾性横断面研究。经过培训的摘要员使用标准化的摘要工具来审查电子病历中是否存在 CR-BSI 以及事件发生时的临床情况。我们通过计算阳性预测值(PPV)来确定该 PSI 的有效性,并分析了真阳性和假阳性病例。
在 112 例审查病例中,有 42 例为 CR-BSI 的真实事件,阳性预测值为 38%(95%CI 29%至 47%)。70 例为假阳性;这些归因于正确的 ICD-9-CM 代码,但诊断超出了指标范围(n=28,40%),编码不准确(n=21,30%);和入院时诊断(n=21,30%)。在 42 例 CR-BSI 患者中,导管留置时间平均为 11 天,20%(n=8)放置在股静脉位置。
PSI 7 对识别真实事件的预测能力相对较差。与编码相关的问题是导致低 PPV 的主要原因。实施入院时编码和使用更具体的 ICD-9-CM 代码将提高其有效性。就目前情况而言,PSI 7 不应作为绩效付费的指标,而应仅限于内部质量改进工作。