• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测患者安全指标:退伍军人健康管理局的“手术中遗留异物”有多准确?

Detecting patient safety indicators: How valid is "foreign body left during procedure" in the Veterans Health Administration?

机构信息

Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research (COLMR), Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):977-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.003
PMID:21489830
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) developed patient safety indicator (PSI) 5, "Foreign body left during procedure," to flag accidental foreign bodies in surgical and medical procedures. This study examined how well this indicator identifies true foreign body events in the Veterans Health Administration (VA).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study within 28 selected VA hospitals from fiscal year 2003 to 2007. Trained abstractors reviewed medical charts flagged by PSI 5 and determined true foreign body cases. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of this indicator and performed descriptive analyses of true positive and false positive cases.

RESULTS

Of the 652,093 eligible cases, 93 were flagged by PSI 5 (0.14 per 1,000). Forty-two were true positives, yielding a PPV of 45% (95% CI 35% to 56%). False positives were due to a foreign body that was present on admission (57%) or coding errors (43%). True foreign bodies were associated with surgical (n = 23) and medical (n = 19) procedures. The most common type of surgical foreign body was a sponge (52%). Overall, approximately 40% of foreign bodies were related to a device failure or malfunction (30% surgical vs 53% medical foreign bodies). Postoperative complications included pain (24%), infection (12%), adhesions (5%), and bowel obstruction (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The reported rate of foreign body events as detected by PSI 5 is low in the VA, but occurs in both surgical and medical procedures. Despite widespread implementation of surgical counts, quality improvement efforts should focus on novel ways to eliminate this "never event" from operations. Future studies are needed to better understand the preventability of medical procedure-associated foreign bodies and particularly, device failure-related foreign bodies.

摘要

背景

医疗保健研究与质量署(AHRQ)开发了患者安全指标(PSI)5,“手术过程中遗留异物”,以标记手术和医疗程序中的意外异物。本研究考察了该指标在退伍军人健康管理局(VA)中识别真正异物事件的效果。

研究设计

这是一项在 2003 年至 2007 年期间从 28 家选定的 VA 医院进行的回顾性研究。经过培训的摘要员审查了 PSI 5 标记的医疗图表,并确定了真正的异物病例。我们计算了该指标的阳性预测值(PPV),并对真正阳性和假阳性病例进行了描述性分析。

结果

在 652,093 例合格病例中,有 93 例被 PSI 5 标记(每 1,000 例 0.14 例)。其中 42 例为真正的阳性,阳性预测值为 45%(95%置信区间为 35%至 56%)。假阳性归因于入院时存在的异物(57%)或编码错误(43%)。真正的异物与手术(n=23)和医疗(n=19)程序有关。最常见的手术异物是海绵(52%)。总体而言,大约 40%的异物与设备故障或故障有关(30%的手术异物与 53%的医疗异物)。术后并发症包括疼痛(24%)、感染(12%)、粘连(5%)和肠梗阻(5%)。

结论

VA 中通过 PSI 5 检测到的异物事件报告率较低,但发生在手术和医疗程序中。尽管广泛实施了手术计数,但质量改进工作应侧重于消除这种“不应发生的事件”的新方法。需要进一步研究以更好地了解与医疗程序相关的异物,特别是与设备故障相关的异物的可预防性。

相似文献

1
Detecting patient safety indicators: How valid is "foreign body left during procedure" in the Veterans Health Administration?检测患者安全指标:退伍军人健康管理局的“手术中遗留异物”有多准确?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):977-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
2
Positive predictive value of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative wound dehiscence".AHRQ 患者安全指标“术后伤口裂开”的阳性预测值。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):962-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.053. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
3
Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.选定的患者安全指标的有效性:机会与关注。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):924-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
4
Positive predictive value of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "Postoperative Sepsis": implications for practice and policy.AHRQ 患者安全指标“术后败血症”的阳性预测值:对实践和政策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):954-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
5
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative respiratory failure"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后呼吸衰竭”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):935-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.034. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
6
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative physiologic and metabolic derangement"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后生理和代谢紊乱”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):968-976.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
7
Validity of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections".AHRQ 患者安全指标“中心静脉导管相关血流感染”的有效性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):984-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
8
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后出血或血肿”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):946-953.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.033. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?验证退伍军人健康管理局的患者安全指标:它们是否能准确识别真实的安全事件?
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):74-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182293edf.
10
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标对儿童医院的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):135-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1083. Epub 2004 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Are temporal trends in retained foreign object rates after surgery in Switzerland impacted by increasing coding intensity? A retrospective analysis of hospital routine data from 2000 to 2019.瑞士术后异物遗留率的时间趋势是否受到编码强度增加的影响?一项对 2000 年至 2019 年医院常规数据的回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 10;13(8):e075660. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075660.
2
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.确定一组医疗保健“永不发生”事件,以推动系统变革:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264.
3
Validation of two case definitions to identify pressure ulcers using hospital administrative data.
利用医院管理数据对两种用于识别压疮的病例定义进行验证。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e016438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016438.
4
Three years evaluation of retained foreign bodies after surgery in Iran.伊朗术后异物留存的三年评估
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan 25;15:22-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.019. eCollection 2017 Mar.
5
Investigating selected patient safety indicators using medical records data.使用医疗记录数据调查选定的患者安全指标。
J Educ Health Promot. 2015 Aug 6;4:54. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.162351. eCollection 2015.
6
Using estimated true safety event rates versus flagged safety event rates: does it change hospital profiling and payment?使用估计的真实安全事件率与标记的安全事件率:这会改变医院的形象和支付方式吗?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1426-45. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12180. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Perioperative patient safety indicators and hospital surgical volumes.围手术期患者安全指标与医院手术量
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Feb 28;7:117. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-117.
8
Impact of including readmissions for qualifying events in the patient safety indicators.将符合条件事件的再入院纳入患者安全指标的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):114-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860613518341. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
9
Validity of ICD-9-CM codes for the identification of complications related to central venous catheterization.用于识别与中心静脉置管相关并发症的国际疾病分类第九版临床修正版(ICD-9-CM)编码的有效性。
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):52-7. doi: 10.1177/1062860613512518. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
10
Using AHRQ patient safety indicators to detect postdischarge adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration.利用美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标检测退伍军人健康管理局出院后的不良事件。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):213-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860613494751. Epub 2013 Aug 12.