• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[应对医疗保健中的瓶颈:法律影响]

[Dealing with bottlenecks in health care: legal implications].

作者信息

Katzenmeier Christian

机构信息

Institut für Medizinrecht, Universität zu Köln, Köln.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.004
PMID:20870484
Abstract

Scarcity in the German health care system leads to an implicit allocation of means and also implies a risk of liability for physicians. Prioritisation can contribute to the solution of these problems and ascertain an equitable allocation of scarce resources. However, the criteria that will be applied to establish a ranking order will have to be thoroughly considered, particularly in light of the constitutional law, and there is still a multitude of unresolved questions seeking an answer. This requires an open political discourse about society and health care.

摘要

德国医疗保健系统中的资源稀缺导致了资源的隐性分配,也给医生带来了责任风险。确定优先次序有助于解决这些问题,并确保稀缺资源的公平分配。然而,用于确定排名顺序的标准必须经过深思熟虑,尤其是考虑到宪法,而且仍有许多未解决的问题有待解答。这需要就社会和医疗保健问题展开公开的政治讨论。

相似文献

1
[Dealing with bottlenecks in health care: legal implications].[应对医疗保健中的瓶颈:法律影响]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
2
[Rationalisation, prioritisation and rationing: approaches to future health care delivery].[合理化、优先排序与配给:未来医疗服务提供的方法]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):355-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
3
[Dealing with bottlenecks in health care--ethical issues].[应对医疗保健中的瓶颈——伦理问题]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
4
[The influence of medical standards, medical guidelines and economic restrictions on the standard of legal liability].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004 May;98(3):222-6; discussion 230-1, 236-7.
5
Ethics of allocating intensive care unit resources.重症监护病房资源分配的伦理问题
New Horiz. 1997 Feb;5(1):38-50.
6
[Rationing in German health care with particular consideration of oncology: view points of German stakeholders--a qualitative interview study].[德国医疗保健中的配给,特别考虑肿瘤学:德国利益相关者的观点——一项定性访谈研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Jan;77(1):8-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1367021. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
7
[After one year of German Health System Modernization Act--current position and perspectives of the German healthcare reform from a political point of view].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(1):6-10.
8
[Determining priorities in German public health--triad between rationing, rationalization and rational allocation].
Gesundheitswesen. 2000 Nov;62(11):559-67. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13043.
9
[Definition and scope of medical professional law].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005 Apr;99(2):89-95; discussion 99-100.
10
[Prioritisation in health care: what does it mean?].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2010;104(5):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
[Legal Issues of Resource Allocation in the COVID-19 Pandemic - Between Utilitarianism and Life Value Indifference].[新冠疫情下资源分配的法律问题——在功利主义与生命价值无差别之间]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020 May;145(10):687-692. doi: 10.1055/a-1146-1160. Epub 2020 Apr 1.