Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Pharmacol. 2010 Jun;42(3):153-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.66838.
Theoretically, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have certain advantages over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, but the contribution of these advantages to the clinical effect of ARBs is not known.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan with enalapril in patients of essential hypertension.
Patients of mild to moderate hypertension were randomized to receive either 40 mg of telmisartan or enalapril 10 mg once a day orally for 12 weeks. At each visit, the systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP and heart rate of each patient were recorded. Investigations such as hemogram hemoglobin, total leucocytes count (Hb, TLC), serum creatinine, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruric transaminase (SGOT, SGPT) random blood sugar and urine examination were performed at baseline and after 12 weeks of the treatment period.
The mean reduction in systolic BP in the telmisartan/enalapril group was 26.38 ± 10.98/26.74 ± 8.24 mmHg while the mean reduction in diastolic BP in the telmisartan/enalapril group was 14 ± 2.98/9.71 ± 4.23 mmHg, respectively, at 12 weeks. When the reduction in systolic BP in the two groups was compared, there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). However, the mean reduction in diastolic BP achieved with telmisartan at 12 weeks was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that achieved with enalapril after the corresponding period. The overall frequency of adverse-effects was similar. However, in the enalapril group, the incidence of dry cough was higher as compared to that in the telmisartan group (11.43% vs. 0%, respectively; P < 0.05).
Telmisartan produces a greater reduction in diastolic BP than enalapril and is free from the adverse-effect of dry cough that is commonly encountered with enalapril.
理论上,血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)比血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)具有某些优势,但这些优势对 ARB 的临床效果的贡献尚不清楚。
比较替米沙坦与依那普利治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。
将轻度至中度高血压患者随机分为替米沙坦组(40mg,每天 1 次口服)和依那普利组(10mg,每天 1 次口服),疗程 12 周。每次就诊时记录每位患者的收缩压(BP)、舒张压和心率。在基线和治疗 12 周后进行血常规(血红蛋白、总白细胞计数[Hb、TLC])、血清肌酐、血清谷草转氨酶、血清谷丙转氨酶(SGOT、SGPT)、随机血糖和尿液检查。
替米沙坦/依那普利组收缩压的平均降幅为 26.38±10.98/26.74±8.24mmHg,舒张压的平均降幅为 14±2.98/9.71±4.23mmHg,两组分别在 12 周时。当比较两组收缩压的降低时,两组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,替米沙坦在 12 周时舒张压的平均降幅明显高于依那普利(P<0.001)。总的不良反应发生率相似。然而,在依那普利组,干咳的发生率高于替米沙坦组(分别为 11.43%和 0%;P<0.05)。
替米沙坦降低舒张压的效果优于依那普利,且无依那普利常见的干咳不良反应。