Suppr超能文献

社会性别开放性和依恋风格对情绪不忠和性不忠反应的影响。

The influences of sociosexuality and attachment style on reactions to emotional versus sexual infidelity.

机构信息

Department of Psychology , Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2011 Sep;48(5):413-22. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.516845. Epub 2011 May 24.

Abstract

Although numerous studies have empirically supported the evolutionary-based prediction of sex differences in reactions to infidelity (men being more distressed by sexual infidelity and women being more distressed by emotional infidelity), little attention has been given to within-sex individual differences in the type of infidelity found to be more distressing. This article considers the effects of sociosexuality (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991 ) and attachment style (e.g., Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991 ) with data from 3,879 college students collected over 14 years. In addition to replicating the robust sex differences, some evidence that sociosexuality and attachment style were related to infidelity reactions was found. Greater sexual permissiveness (i.e., high scores on sociosexuality) was associated with greater distress to sexual infidelity. In addition, a preoccupied attachment style was found to increase men's odds of selecting emotional infidelity, whereas an avoidant attachment style was found to increase women's odds of selecting sexual infidelity.

摘要

尽管许多研究从实证上支持了基于进化的对不忠反应的性别差异预测(男性对性不忠的反应更痛苦,而女性对情感不忠的反应更痛苦),但很少有人关注在同一性别中,哪种不忠类型会更令人痛苦的个体差异。本文考虑了性开放度(辛普森和冈斯特德,1991)和依恋风格(例如,巴塞洛缪和霍罗威茨,1991)的影响,数据来自 14 年间收集的 3879 名大学生。除了复制强有力的性别差异外,还发现了一些证据表明性开放度和依恋风格与不忠反应有关。更大的性开放度(即性开放度得分较高)与对性不忠的更大痛苦有关。此外,发现依恋风格专注会增加男性选择情感不忠的几率,而依恋风格回避会增加女性选择性不忠的几率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验