Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada; and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Int J Audiol. 2010 Oct;49(10):733-40. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.491097.
The purposes of the study were to examine the test-retest properties of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) and to determine if the method of test administration affected these properties. Four groups of 40 older adult participants completed the SSQ twice at an interval of about a half year, using either the same or different administration methods at the two test times. The SSQ was administered using an interview method and/or it was self-administered and then returned by mail. Although the method of test administration did not systematically affect scores on the SSQ, the highest test-retest correlation (r = 0.83) was observed using the interview method at both test times, making it the best choice for the purpose of demonstrating the effectiveness of interventions. The other three combinations of dual-administration in this study also provided reliable results and may be preferable because the self-administration method is less time-consuming and labour-intensive.
本研究旨在考察言语、空间和听觉质量量表(SSQ)的重测信度,并确定测试管理方法是否会影响这些特性。四个组的 40 名老年参与者在大约半年的时间间隔内两次完成 SSQ,在两次测试时使用相同或不同的管理方法。SSQ 采用访谈法和/或自我管理,然后通过邮件返回。尽管测试管理方法并没有系统地影响 SSQ 的分数,但在两次测试时使用访谈法观察到的最高重测相关性(r=0.83),这使得它成为证明干预效果的最佳选择。本研究中其他三种双重管理组合也提供了可靠的结果,可能更可取,因为自我管理方法耗时和劳力更少。