Hey Matthias, Kogel Kevyn, Dambon Jan, Mewes Alexander, Jürgens Tim, Hocke Thomas
ENT Clinic, UKSH Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Institute of Acoustics, University of Applied Sciences Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 29;13(15):4436. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154436.
In cochlear implant (CI) treatment, there is a large variability in outcome. The aim of our study was to identify the independent audiometric measures that are most directly relevant for describing this variability in outcome characteristics of CI recipients. An extended audiometric test battery was used with selected adult patients in order to characterize the full range of CI outcomes. : CI users were recruited for this study on the basis of their postoperative results and divided into three groups: low (1st quartile), moderate (medium decentile), and high hearing performance (4th quartile). Speech recognition was measured in quiet by using (i) monosyllabic words (40-80 dB SPL), (ii) speech reception threshold (SRT) for numbers, and (iii) the German matrix test in noise. In order to reconstruct demanding everyday listening situations in the clinic, the temporal characteristics of the background noise and the spatial arrangements of the signal sources were varied for tests in noise. In addition, a survey was conducted using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire and the Listening Effort (LE) questionnaire. : Fifteen subjects per group were examined (total N = 45), who did not differ significantly in terms of age, time after CI surgery, or CI use behavior. The groups differed mainly in the results of speech audiometry. For speech recognition, significant differences were found between the three groups for the monosyllabic tests in quiet and for the sentences in stationary (S0°N0°) and fluctuating (S0°NCI) noise. Word comprehension and sentence comprehension in quiet were both strongly correlated with the SRT in noise. This observation was also confirmed by a factor analysis. No significant differences were found between the three groups for the SSQ questionnaire and the LE questionnaire results. The results of the factor analysis indicate that speech recognition in noise provides information highly comparable to information from speech intelligibility in quiet. : The factor analysis highlighted three components describing the postoperative outcome of CI patients. These were (i) the audiometrically measured supra-threshold speech recognition and (ii) near-threshold audibility, as well as (iii) the subjective assessment of the relationship to real life as determined by the questionnaires. These parameters appear well suited to setting up a framework for a test battery to assess CI outcomes.
在人工耳蜗(CI)治疗中,治疗结果存在很大差异。我们研究的目的是确定与描述CI接受者治疗结果特征的这种差异最直接相关的独立听力测定指标。为了全面描述CI的治疗结果,我们对选定的成年患者使用了一套扩展的听力测试组合。本研究根据术后结果招募CI使用者,并将其分为三组:低听力表现组(第一四分位数)、中等听力表现组(中等十分位数)和高听力表现组(第四四分位数)。通过以下方式在安静环境中测量言语识别能力:(i)单音节词(40 - 80 dB声压级),(ii)数字的言语接受阈(SRT),以及(iii)噪声中的德语矩阵测试。为了在临床中重现日常的高要求听力场景,在噪声测试中改变背景噪声的时间特性和信号源的空间布局。此外,使用言语、空间和质量(SSQ)问卷以及听力努力(LE)问卷进行了一项调查。每组检查15名受试者(共N = 45),他们在年龄、CI手术后时间或CI使用行为方面没有显著差异。各组主要在言语测听结果方面存在差异。对于言语识别,在安静环境中的单音节测试以及在固定噪声(S0°N0°)和波动噪声(S0°NCI)中的句子测试中,三组之间存在显著差异。安静环境中的单词理解和句子理解都与噪声中的SRT密切相关。这一观察结果也得到了因子分析的证实。在SSQ问卷和LE问卷结果方面,三组之间未发现显著差异。因子分析结果表明,噪声中的言语识别提供的信息与安静环境中言语可懂度提供的信息高度可比。因子分析突出了描述CI患者术后结果的三个成分。这些成分分别是:(i)听力测定的阈上言语识别,(ii)近阈可听度,以及(iii)通过问卷确定的与现实生活关系的主观评估。这些参数似乎非常适合建立一个用于评估CI结果的测试组合框架。