Department of Pharmacy, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01424.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of medication information available in medical charts before and after the implementation of a medication reconciliation form.
This study is a retrospective chart review of patients under 18 years who were taking two medications or more at home and were admitted to a paediatric hospital for more than 24 hours and discharged from a general paediatrics, infectious disease, gastroenterology or pneumology ward over two 20-week periods (pre- and post-implementation). Each week, 10 medical records were randomly chosen and reviewed. The quality of the medication information was measured on admission (dose, route of administration and frequency) and on discharge (dose, route of administration, frequency and duration of treatment). The proportion of medications that fully met these criteria was compared between the groups using the chi-squared test.
Information was analysed for a total of 3275 medications in the pre-implementation group, vs. 3240 medications in the post-implementation group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. On admission, the quality of medication information was comparable between the pre- and post-implementation groups (29.1 vs. 29.3%, respectively; P = 0.86). However, on discharge, an improvement in the quality of information was observed in the post-implementation group (51.7 vs. 65.2%; P < 0.001).
Our study demonstrated that the forms used in the reconciliation process, in particular the discharge prescription, could increase the quality of the information related to drug use in medical charts. We believe that medication reconciliation forms should be widely used by all the health care professional teams involved in the drug history or prescription process.
本研究旨在评估实施用药核对表前后医疗记录中药物信息的质量。
这是一项回顾性病历研究,纳入在家中服用两种或更多种药物且在儿科医院住院时间超过 24 小时、从普通儿科、传染病科、胃肠病科或呼吸科病房出院的 18 岁以下患者。在两个 20 周的时间段(实施前后)内,每周随机选择 10 份病历进行回顾。入院时(剂量、给药途径和频率)和出院时(剂量、给药途径、频率和治疗持续时间)评估药物信息质量。使用卡方检验比较两组之间完全符合这些标准的药物比例。
共分析了实施前组 3275 种药物和实施后组 3240 种药物的信息。两组的基线特征相似。入院时,实施前后两组的药物信息质量相当(分别为 29.1%和 29.3%;P=0.86)。然而,出院时,实施后组的信息质量有所改善(分别为 51.7%和 65.2%;P<0.001)。
我们的研究表明,在核对过程中使用的表格,特别是出院处方,可以提高医疗记录中与药物使用相关信息的质量。我们认为,用药核对表应该由参与药物史或处方过程的所有医疗保健专业团队广泛使用。