• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估华盛顿州一家医院电子病历系统中药物信息的准确性。

Assessing the accuracy of drug profiles in an electronic medical record system of a Washington state hospital.

机构信息

Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Oct 1;16(10):e245-50.

PMID:20964475
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of patients' electronic medical record (EMR) drug profiles, to assess the relationship of copayment status with errors of commission and omission within drug profiles, and to evaluate the association between errors of commission in primary and secondary sections of the drug profiles.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of patients' EMR drug profiles at a 46-bed hospital in Washington state.

METHODS

Patients' drug profiles were compared against hospital staff interviews. Drug profiles listing each medication the patient was taking, without listing drugs the patient was not taking, exhibited perfect accuracy. We evaluated associations between errors of commission and omission, copayment status between errors of commission and omission, and associations between errors of commission in primary and secondary sections of the drug profiles.

RESULTS

Demographics of study patients are similar to previously published research, and accuracy outcomes seem to be better than those of previously published studies. Fifty-six percent of drug profiles in our study hospital exhibited perfect accuracy. Errors of commission and omission were unassociated with copayment status; errors of commission in the primary section of the drug profile were unassociated with errors of commission in the secondary section of the drug profile.

CONCLUSIONS

A medication reconciliation program may have led to a high rate of perfectly accurate drug profiles; while its purpose is to increase accuracy and to decrease errors, it may also assist in reducing adverse drug events. Results show that copayment amounts influence drug utilization; these may be associated with errors of commission and omission and not simply with copayment status.

摘要

目的

确定患者电子病历(EMR)药物概况的准确性,评估共付状况与药物概况中用药错误的关系,并评估药物概况主次两部分用药错误之间的关联。

研究设计

华盛顿州一家 46 床医院的患者 EMR 药物概况的横断面分析。

方法

将患者的药物概况与医院工作人员访谈进行比较。列出患者正在服用的每种药物而未列出患者未服用的药物的药物概况显示出完美的准确性。我们评估了用药错误和遗漏之间的关联、共付状况与用药错误和遗漏之间的关联,以及药物概况主次两部分用药错误之间的关联。

结果

研究患者的人口统计学特征与之前发表的研究相似,且准确性结果似乎优于之前发表的研究。我们研究医院的 56%的药物概况显示出完美的准确性。用药错误和遗漏与共付状况无关;药物概况主要部分的用药错误与药物概况次要部分的用药错误无关。

结论

药物重整计划可能导致了高比例的完全准确的药物概况;虽然其目的是提高准确性并减少错误,但它也可能有助于减少药物不良事件。结果表明,共付金额影响药物利用;这些可能与用药错误有关,而不仅仅与共付状况有关。

相似文献

1
Assessing the accuracy of drug profiles in an electronic medical record system of a Washington state hospital.评估华盛顿州一家医院电子病历系统中药物信息的准确性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Oct 1;16(10):e245-50.
2
Assessing the accuracy of computerized medication histories.评估计算机化用药史的准确性。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):872-7.
3
Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.急诊患者诊疗记录与编码:电子病历准确性评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):664-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.005.
4
Electronic health record components and the quality of care.电子健康记录组件与医疗质量。
Med Care. 2008 Dec;46(12):1267-72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e18ae.
5
Medication reconciliation is a prerequisite for obtaining a valid medication review.用药核对是获得有效用药评估的前提条件。
Dan Med J. 2013 Apr;60(4):A4605.
6
Electronic health records--at what cost to care?电子健康记录——医疗成本几何?
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009 May;109(5):255-6.
7
An effort to improve electronic health record medication list accuracy between visits: patients' and physicians' response.提高就诊期间电子健康记录用药清单准确性的努力:患者和医生的反应。
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Mar;77(3):153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
8
Cross-sectional comparison of electronic and paper medical records on medication counseling in primary care clinics: a Southern Primary-Care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) study.基层医疗诊所中电子病历与纸质病历在用药咨询方面的横断面比较:一项南方基层医疗城市研究网络(SPUR-Net)研究
J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):164-73. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060113.
9
Accuracy of Electronic Medical Record Medication Reconciliation in Emergency Department Patients.急诊科患者电子病历用药核对的准确性
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.052. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
Do hospitals with electronic medical records (EMRs) provide higher quality care?: an examination of three clinical conditions.拥有电子病历(EMR)的医院能提供更高质量的医疗服务吗?:对三种临床病症的考察
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Aug;65(4):496-513. doi: 10.1177/1077558707313437. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of an electronic prescribing system for standard treatments.标准治疗电子处方系统的准确性。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jul;30(4):232-236. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002909. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
[Reliability of Primary Care computerised medication records].[基层医疗计算机化药物记录的可靠性]
Aten Primaria. 2016 Mar;48(3):183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
3
Racial differences in clinical treatment and self-care behaviors of adults with chronic heart failure.慢性心力衰竭成年患者临床治疗及自我护理行为中的种族差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Apr 13;4(4):e001561. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001561.
4
The effectiveness of risk management program on pediatric nurses' medication error.风险管理计划对儿科护士用药错误的有效性。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013 Sep;18(5):371-7.