Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal, Montreal, CanadaDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, FranceDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of UrologyMartini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanySidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NYGlickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(5):765-770. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09594.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
• To investigate the pathological characteristics and the rates of biochemical recurrence (BCR) -free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with high-risk prostate cancer.
• Of 4760 patients treated with RP for prostate cancer at three institutions, 293 patients (6.2%) had clinical stage T3, 269 (5.7%) had a biopsy Gleason sum ≥ 8, 370 (7.8%) had preoperative PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and 887 (18.6%) were considered high-risk according to the D'Amico classification (clinical stage ≥ T2c or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL or biopsy Gleason sum ≥ 8). • Actuarial BCR-free survival probabilities after RP and the rate of favourable pathology (organ-confined cancer, negative surgical margin and Gleason ≤ 7) were assessed.
• Median follow up was 2.4 years and 1179 (24.8%) patients had follow up beyond 5 years. • The rate of favourable pathology increased in the following order: clinical stage T3 (13.7%), biopsy Gleason ≥ 8 (16.4%), the D'Amico high-risk group (21.4%) and PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (21.6%). • The 5-year BCR-free survival probabilities were 35.4% for Gleason ≥ 8, 39.8% for PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL, 47.4% for D'Amico high-risk group and 51.6% for clinical stage T3. • Patients with only one risk factor had the most favourable 5-year BCR-free survival (50.3%), relative to patients with two or more risk factors (27.5%)
• Men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer do not have a uniformly poor prognosis after RP. • The rate of favourable pathology and of BCR-free survival may vary substantially, depending on the definition used. • RP should be considered a valid treatment modality for high-risk prostate cancer patients, as many can be surgically down-staged.
探讨根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗高危前列腺癌患者的病理特征和生化无复发生存率(BCR)。
在三家机构接受 RP 治疗的 4760 例前列腺癌患者中,293 例(6.2%)临床分期 T3,269 例(5.7%)活检 Gleason 评分总和≥8,370 例(7.8%)术前 PSA≥20ng/ml,887 例(18.6%)根据 D'Amico 分类为高危(临床分期≥T2c 或 PSA≥20ng/ml 或活检 Gleason 评分总和≥8)。评估 RP 后 BCR 无复发生存率的累积概率和有利病理学(器官局限性癌、切缘阴性和 Gleason≤7)的发生率。
中位随访时间为 2.4 年,1179 例(24.8%)患者随访时间超过 5 年。有利病理学的发生率依次为:临床分期 T3(13.7%)、活检 Gleason≥8(16.4%)、D'Amico 高危组(21.4%)和 PSA≥20ng/ml(21.6%)。Gleason≥8、PSA≥20ng/ml、D'Amico 高危组和临床分期 T3 的 5 年 BCR 无复发生存率分别为 35.4%、39.8%、47.4%和 51.6%。只有一个危险因素的患者 5 年 BCR 无复发生存率(50.3%)最有利,而有两个或更多危险因素的患者(27.5%)则相对较低。
RP 治疗局限性高危前列腺癌患者的预后并非普遍较差。取决于所使用的定义,有利病理学和 BCR 无复发生存率的差异可能很大。RP 应被视为高危前列腺癌患者的一种有效的治疗方式,因为许多患者可以通过手术降期。