• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代 NCCN 高危前列腺癌患者的精囊侵犯率。

Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(10):1051-1059. doi: 10.1002/pros.24350. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1002/pros.24350
PMID:35403734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9325368/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) rates in National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients are not well known but essential for treatment planning. We examined SVI rates according to individual patient characteristics for purpose of treatment planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Within Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015), 4975 NCCN high-risk patients were identified. In the development cohort (SEER geographic region of residence: South, North-East, Mid-West, n = 2456), we fitted a multivariable logistic regression model predicting SVI. Its accuracy, calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCAs) were then tested versus previous models within the external validation cohort (SEER geographic region of residence: West, n = 2519).

RESULTS

Out of 4975 patients, 28% had SVI. SVI rate ranged from 8% to 89% according to clinical T stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason Grade Group and percentage of positive biopsy cores. In the development cohort, these variables were independent predictors of SVI. In the external validation cohort, the current model achieved 77.6% accuracy vs 73.7% for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) vs 68.6% for Gallina et al. Calibration was better than for the two alternatives: departures from ideal predictions were 6.0% for the current model vs 9.8% for MSKCC vs 38.5% for Gallina et al. In DCAs, the current model outperformed both alternatives. Finally, different nomogram cutoffs allowed to discriminate between low versus high SVI risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

More than a quarter of NCCN high-risk PCa patients harbored SVI. Since SVI positivity rate varies from 8% to 89%, the currently developed model offers a valuable approach to distinguish between low and high SVI risk patients.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)高危前列腺癌(PCa)患者的精囊侵犯(SVI)率,但这对于治疗计划至关重要。我们根据患者的个体特征检查了 SVI 率,以进行治疗计划。

材料与方法

在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2010-2015 年)中,确定了 4975 名 NCCN 高危患者。在开发队列(SEER 居住地地理区域:南部、东北部、中西部,n=2456)中,我们拟合了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,用于预测 SVI。然后,在外部验证队列(SEER 居住地地理区域:西部,n=2519)中,对该模型的准确性、校准和决策曲线分析(DCAs)进行了测试,以评估其与之前模型的对比。

结果

在 4975 名患者中,有 28%的患者存在 SVI。根据临床 T 分期、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、活检 Gleason 分级组和阳性活检核心百分比,SVI 率从 8%到 89%不等。在开发队列中,这些变量是 SVI 的独立预测因子。在外部验证队列中,当前模型的准确率为 77.6%,而 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre(MSKCC)为 73.7%,Gallina 等人的模型为 68.6%。与两种替代方案相比,校准更好:当前模型的预测偏差为 6.0%,MSKCC 为 9.8%,Gallina 等人的模型为 38.5%。在 DCA 中,当前模型优于两种替代方案。最后,不同的诺模图截止值可以区分低 SVI 风险和高 SVI 风险患者。

结论

超过四分之一的 NCCN 高危 PCa 患者存在 SVI。由于 SVI 阳性率从 8%到 89%不等,因此当前开发的模型提供了一种有价值的方法来区分低 SVI 风险和高 SVI 风险患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/e669aa60ffa3/PROS-82-1051-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/34e774d02bf2/PROS-82-1051-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/8112d33a7903/PROS-82-1051-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/e669aa60ffa3/PROS-82-1051-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/34e774d02bf2/PROS-82-1051-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/8112d33a7903/PROS-82-1051-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea06/9325368/e669aa60ffa3/PROS-82-1051-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients.当代 NCCN 高危前列腺癌患者的精囊侵犯率。
Prostate. 2022 Jun;82(10):1051-1059. doi: 10.1002/pros.24350. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.精囊侵犯列线图的多机构外部验证:加利纳列线图与2007年帕廷表格的直接比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):1461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1913. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
3
Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy.预测根治性前列腺切除术中精囊侵犯概率的列线图的开发与分割样本验证。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.060. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
4
External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.基于多参数磁共振成像的列线图预测行前列腺根治术的前列腺癌患者发生囊外侵犯和精囊侵犯的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.037. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
5
External validation of a Brazilian predictive nomogram for pathologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy in tertiary teaching institutions: the USP nomograms.巴西预测模型在三级教学医院前列腺根治性切除术后病理结局的外部验证:USP 列线图。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):161-71. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.05.
6
Contemporary Pathological Stage Distribution After Radical Prostatectomy in North American High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.北美高危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的当代病理分期分布。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Oct;20(5):e380-e389. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Novel nomogram for the prediction of seminal vesicle invasion including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.基于多参数磁共振成像的预测精囊侵犯的新型列线图。
Int J Urol. 2019 Apr;26(4):458-464. doi: 10.1111/iju.13905. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in National Comprehensive Cancer Network High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.列线图预测接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的美国国家综合癌症网络高危前列腺癌患者的降级。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1133-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
9
One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Compared with Clinical Nomograms for Preoperative T and N Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer.一站式全身 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI 与临床列线图在高危前列腺癌术前 T 和 N 分期中的比较。
J Nucl Med. 2018 Dec;59(12):1850-1856. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.207696. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Do prostate cancer nomograms give accurate information when applied to European patients?前列腺癌列线图应用于欧洲患者时能提供准确信息吗?
Scand J Urol. 2015 Feb;49(1):16-24. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.920415. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicopathological analysis of the absence of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer patients without radiological evidence on magnetic resonance imaging.磁共振成像无影像学证据的前列腺癌患者精囊侵犯缺失的临床病理分析
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025 Jun 7;30(2):216-222. doi: 10.5603/rpor.105863. eCollection 2025.
2
Ga-labeled prostate specific membrane antigen HBED-CC PET/MRI for staging and evaluating the clinicopathological characteristics in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.镓标记的前列腺特异性膜抗原HBED-CC PET/MRI用于新诊断前列腺癌的分期及评估临床病理特征
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 21;30(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02567-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Non-organ confined stage and upgrading rates in exclusive PSA high-risk prostate cancer patients.单纯前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)高危前列腺癌患者的非器官局限性阶段及升级率
Prostate. 2022 May;82(6):687-694. doi: 10.1002/pros.24313. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
2
Cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk African American prostate cancer patients.根治性前列腺切除术与外照射放疗治疗高危和极高危非裔美国前列腺癌患者的癌症特异性生存。
Prostate. 2022 Jan;82(1):120-131. doi: 10.1002/pros.24253. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Survival after Radical Prostatectomy versus Radiation Therapy in High-Risk and Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Prognostic significance of the mEPE score in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing ultrahypofractionated robotic SBRT.
mEPE评分在接受超分割机器人立体定向放疗的中危前列腺癌患者中的预后意义。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02355-y.
4
The association of type and number of high-risk criteria with cancer-specific mortality in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者中,高风险标准的类型和数量与癌症特异性死亡率的关联。
Curr Urol. 2024 Jun;18(2):128-132. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000188. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
The Sensitivity and Specificity of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Predicting Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.多参数磁共振成像和前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描预测临床显著性前列腺癌精囊侵犯的敏感性和特异性:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 29;13(15):4424. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154424.
6
Relative impact of lymph-node metastasis and seminal vesical invasion on oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.淋巴结转移和精囊侵犯对根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤学结果的相对影响。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Dec;27(4):674-679. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00724-9. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in the distribution and effect of type and number of high-risk criteria on mortality in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.接受放疗的前列腺癌患者中,高风险标准的类型和数量在分布及对死亡率的影响方面存在种族/民族差异。
Arab J Urol. 2022 Nov 21;21(3):135-141. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2148867. eCollection 2023.
8
Adverse upgrading and/or upstaging in contemporary low-risk prostate cancer patients.当代低危前列腺癌患者中的不良升级和/或升级。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;54(10):2521-2528. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03250-0. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
高危和极高危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后与放射治疗后的生存率比较
J Urol. 2022 Feb;207(2):375-384. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002250. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in National Comprehensive Cancer Network High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.列线图预测接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的美国国家综合癌症网络高危前列腺癌患者的降级。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1133-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Increasing rates of NCCN high and very high-risk prostate cancer versus number of prostate biopsy cores.NCCN 高危和极高危前列腺癌比例与前列腺活检核心数量的变化。
Prostate. 2021 Sep;81(12):874-881. doi: 10.1002/pros.24184. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021.NCCN 指南解读:前列腺癌,第 1.2021 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 2;19(2):134-143. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008.
7
External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.基于多参数磁共振成像的列线图预测行前列腺根治术的前列腺癌患者发生囊外侵犯和精囊侵犯的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.037. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
8
Technical Refinements in Superextended Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.多参数磁共振成像局部晚期前列腺癌患者超延伸机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术中的技术改进。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Metastasis, Mortality, and Quality of Life for Men With NCCN High and Very High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer After Surgical and/or Combined Modality Radiotherapy.对于接受手术和/或联合模式放疗的 NCCN 高风险和极高风险局限性前列腺癌男性患者,转移、死亡率和生活质量。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Aug;18(4):274-283.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.023. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:在侵袭性和局部进展性前列腺癌中的功能和早期肿瘤学结果。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9.