Lemaire Edward D, O'Neill Patricia A, Desrosiers Marcel M, Robertson D Gordon
Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre, ON, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;91(10):1516-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.215.
To explore manual wheelchair propulsion strategies for ramp ascent and descent in snow and snow-ice-grit conditions.
Cross-sectional study.
Climatic Engineering and Testing Chamber (Ottawa, Canada).
Manual wheelchair users (N=11) who typically self-propel their wheelchair in winter.
Ramp ascent and descent at 3 grades (1:10, 1:12, 1:16) and 2 winter conditions (packed snow, packed snow with a freezing rain cover, and traction grit).
Type of ascent and descent strategy, success rate, number and severity of obstructions, average speed, and perceived ramp navigation rating. A questionnaire regarding the subject's past experiences with wheelchair propulsion in winter.
Snow accumulation on ramps at 1:10 grade will render the ramp inaccessible for many wheelchair users who do not have external assistance. For snow conditions, the transition area from the level group to the first 2m of ramp incline were the most difficult to traverse for both ascent and descent. All subjects were able to ascend and descend the ramp for the ice-grit condition. Two-railing propulsion is a preferred strategy for ice-grit ramp navigation because of enhanced trajectory control and reducing the potential for wheel-slip problems. Backwards ramp ascent was a successful strategy for ascent in soft-snow conditions.
The 1:16 grade is preferred for winter ramp navigation. Backwards ramp ascent for snow conditions should be considered for people with sufficient shoulder and trunk range of motion. Two handrails are recommended for exterior ramps for both propulsion and wheelchair extraction from ruts and other snow-related obstacles. For ice ramp navigation, the amount of grit required and the effective time (ie, time to when grit becomes embedded in snow-ice, becoming much less effective) should be addressed in further research. Front wheels typically available with manual wheelchairs are not appropriate for soft-snow conditions.
探索在雪地及雪 - 冰 - 沙砾环境中手动轮椅上下斜坡的推进策略。
横断面研究。
气候工程与测试室(加拿大渥太华)。
冬季通常自行推动轮椅的手动轮椅使用者(N = 11)。
在3种坡度(1:10、1:12、1:16)和2种冬季条件(压实雪、有冻雨覆盖的压实雪以及防滑沙砾)下进行斜坡上下行。
上下坡策略类型、成功率、障碍物数量及严重程度、平均速度以及斜坡导航感知评分。一份关于受试者冬季轮椅推进过往经历的问卷。
对于许多没有外部协助的轮椅使用者而言,坡度为1:10的斜坡上积雪会使其无法通行。在雪地条件下,从水平路段到斜坡起始2米的过渡区域,上下行都最难通过。所有受试者都能够在有冰 - 沙砾的条件下上下斜坡。双轨推进是冰 - 沙砾斜坡导航的首选策略,因为它能增强轨迹控制并减少车轮打滑问题。向后斜坡上行是软雪条件下上行成功的策略。
冬季斜坡导航首选1:16的坡度。对于肩部和躯干活动范围足够的人,在雪地条件下应考虑向后斜坡上行。建议外部斜坡设置两个扶手,用于推进以及将轮椅从车辙和其他与雪相关的障碍物中移出。对于结冰斜坡导航,所需沙砾量及有效时间(即沙砾嵌入雪 - 冰中变得效果大减的时间)应在进一步研究中探讨。手动轮椅通常配备的前轮不适用于软雪条件。