Deems-Dluhy Susan L, Jayaraman Chandrasekaran, Green Steve, Albert Mark V, Jayaraman Arun
Max Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Center for Bionic Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL(∗).
Max Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Center for Bionic Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL(†).
PM R. 2017 May;9(5):483-493. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Difficulty ascending ramps and inclines with a manual wheelchair adversely affects the everyday mobility and overall quality of life of manual wheelchair users. Currently, various anti-rollback devices are available to assist manual wheelchair users to ascend ramps and inclines. However, these devices have 2 main shortcomings: restriction to backward motion limiting recovery from an overturning wheelchair, which is a safety concern; and difficulty in engaging/disengaging the device while on the ramp.
To evaluate the functionality and usability of 2 novel wheelchair anti-rollback devices developed to address these shortcomings (prototypes "Wheel" and "Brake").
Cross-sectional.
Rehabilitation research facility.
Twelve adult participants with chronic spinal cord injury.
Participants completed training and tested with both the wheelchair anti-rollback devices on a 7.3-m-long ramp.
Number of stops, perceived physical exertion, pain, and ease of use of these devices as participants maneuvered their wheelchairs up a 7.3-m ramp were assessed. Participants also evaluated their satisfaction with the usability of both the devices using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0).
Both prototypes evaluated overcame the limitations of the existing anti-rollback devices. Nonparametric statistical tests showed that participants rated both prototypes similarly for the overall functional and usability aspects. However, the participants' satisfactory rating were higher for the prototype "Brake" than for the prototype "Wheel" based on a functional aspect (ie, engaging/disengaging easiness), and higher for Wheel than for Brake, based on a usability aspect (prototype size).
The qualitative and quantitative outcomes of this investigation, based on the usability and functional evaluations, provided useful information for the improvement in the design of both anti-rollback devices, which may allow manual wheelchair users to manage ramp ascent more safely and easily. Further evaluations with a different SCI population is recommended.
IV.
使用手动轮椅上坡和爬坡困难会对手动轮椅使用者的日常活动能力和整体生活质量产生不利影响。目前,有各种防后翻装置可帮助手动轮椅使用者上坡和爬坡。然而,这些装置有两个主要缺点:限制向后移动,限制了从翻倒轮椅中恢复的能力,这是一个安全问题;以及在坡道上使用该装置时难以接合/脱离。
评估为解决这些缺点而开发的两种新型轮椅防后翻装置(“轮式”和“刹车式”原型)的功能和可用性。
横断面研究。
康复研究机构。
12名患有慢性脊髓损伤的成年参与者。
参与者完成培训,并在一个7.3米长的坡道上使用两种轮椅防后翻装置进行测试。
评估参与者在将轮椅驶上7.3米坡道时这些装置的停车次数、感知到的体力消耗、疼痛程度和易用性。参与者还使用魁北克辅助技术满意度用户评估(QUEST 2.0)对这两种装置的可用性满意度进行了评估。
评估的两种原型均克服了现有防后翻装置的局限性。非参数统计测试表明,参与者在整体功能和可用性方面对两种原型的评价相似。然而,基于功能方面(即接合/脱离的难易程度),参与者对“刹车式”原型的满意度评分高于“轮式”原型;基于可用性方面(原型尺寸),对“轮式”原型的满意度评分高于“刹车式”原型。
基于可用性和功能评估的本次调查的定性和定量结果,为改进这两种防后翻装置的设计提供了有用信息,这可能使手动轮椅使用者更安全、轻松地上坡。建议对不同的脊髓损伤人群进行进一步评估。
IV级。