Suppr超能文献

[腹部特定病变超声引导下细针与粗针穿刺的比较]

[Comparison of ultrasound-controlled fine needle and coarse needle puncture of defined lesions in the abdomen].

作者信息

Swobodnik W, Janowitz P, Kratzer W, Wechsler J G, Hagel S, Eckert E, Binder T, Bültmann B, Kuhn K, Hagert N

机构信息

Abteilung Innere Medizin II der Medizinischen Klinik und Poliklinik der Universität Ulm.

出版信息

Ultraschall Med. 1990 Dec;11(6):287-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1011578.

Abstract

Within a 2-year period 677 diagnostic fine needle (DFP) and coarse needle punctures (DGP) were performed in 536 patients. In 34 patients (14 women; 20 men; 54 +/- 17.6 years) the abdominal tumour mass was punctured with the fine needle (22 g) as well as with the coarse (18 g) needle. Sensitivity of DGP accounted for 72%, sensitivity of DFP was 82.6%. Specificity was 100%, respectively. Complications could not be observed, neither with the coarse needle nor with the fine needle. Due to the high sensitivity of DFP this method should be employed first in the diagnostic work up of abdominal tumours.

摘要

在两年时间内,对536例患者进行了677次诊断性细针穿刺(DFP)和粗针穿刺(DGP)。在34例患者(14名女性;20名男性;54±17.6岁)中,用细针(22G)和粗针(18G)对腹部肿瘤块进行了穿刺。DGP的敏感性为72%,DFP的敏感性为82.6%。特异性均为100%。粗针和细针穿刺均未观察到并发症。由于DFP具有较高的敏感性,该方法应首先用于腹部肿瘤的诊断性检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验