Division of Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):813-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1590-3. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
One possible cause of shoulder pain is rotator cuff contact with the superior glenoid (cuff-glenoid contact) with the arm in flexion, as occurs during a Neer impingement sign. It has been assumed that the pain with a Neer impingement sign on physical examination of the shoulder was secondary to the rotator cuff making contact with the anterior and lateral acromion.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined if the arm position where pain occurs with a Neer impingement sign would correlate with the position where the rotator cuff made contact with the superior glenoid, as determined by arthroscopic evaluation.
We prospectively studied 398 consecutive patients with a positive Neer impingement sign during office examination and used a handheld goniometer to measure (in degrees of flexion) the arm position in which impingement pain occurred. During subsequent arthroscopy, the arm was moved into a similar position, and we measured the arm's position in flexion at the point the rotator cuff made contact with the superior glenoid using a handheld goniometer. We compared the degrees of flexion at which pain occurred preoperatively and at which there was cuff-glenoid contact.
Among the 398 patients, 302 (76%) had arthroscopically documented cuff-glenoid contact, whereas 96 did not. For the 302 patients with a positive Neer sign preoperatively and with arthroscopically documented cuff-glenoid contact, the average preoperative impingement pain position was 120.1°±26.7°, similar to that of the average intraoperative cuff-glenoid contact position of 120.6°±14.7°.
Our data suggest pain associated with a positive Neer sign more often relates to contact of the rotator cuff with the superior glenoid than to contact between the rotator cuff and acromion.
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
肩部疼痛的一个可能原因是肩袖在手臂弯曲时与上肩胛(肩袖 - 肩胛接触)接触,如在 Neer 撞击征中发生的那样。人们一直认为,在肩部体检时,Neer 撞击征阳性引起的疼痛是由于肩袖与前侧和外侧肩峰接触引起的。
问题/目的:我们确定 Neer 撞击征阳性时出现疼痛的手臂位置是否与关节镜评估确定的肩袖与上肩胛接触的位置相关。
我们前瞻性研究了 398 例在办公室检查中出现阳性 Neer 撞击征的连续患者,并使用手持量角器测量(以弯曲度为单位)发生撞击疼痛时手臂的位置。在随后的关节镜检查中,手臂被移动到类似位置,我们使用手持量角器测量肩袖与上肩胛接触时手臂的弯曲度。我们比较了术前出现疼痛的弯曲度和肩袖 - 肩胛接触时的弯曲度。
在 398 例患者中,有 302 例(76%)关节镜下有肩袖 - 肩胛接触的记录,而有 96 例没有。对于术前 Neer 征阳性且关节镜下有肩袖 - 肩胛接触的 302 例患者,术前撞击疼痛位置的平均角度为 120.1°±26.7°,与术中肩袖 - 肩胛接触位置的平均角度 120.6°±14.7°相似。
我们的数据表明,与阳性 Neer 征相关的疼痛更常与肩袖与上肩胛的接触有关,而不是与肩袖和肩峰之间的接触有关。
II 级,预后研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。