Suppr超能文献

体格检查对孤立性慢性肩锁关节损伤的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of physical tests for isolated chronic acromioclavicular lesions.

作者信息

Chronopoulos Efstathios, Kim Tae Kyun, Park Hyung Bin, Ashenbrenner Diane, McFarland Edward G

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):655-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261723.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions are a common source of pain and disability in the shoulder. The goal of this study was to evaluate diagnostic values of physical tests for isolated, chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2002, 35 patients underwent a distal clavicle excision for isolated acromioclavicular joint lesions. The results of 3 commonly used examinations for acromioclavicular joint lesions were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy.

RESULTS

The cross body adduction stress test showed the greatest sensitivity (77%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (72%) and active compression test (41%). The active compression test had the greatest specificity (95%). All tests had a negative predictive value of greater than 94%, but the positive predictive value was less than 30% for all tests. The active compression test had the highest overall accuracy (92%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (84%) and the cross arm adduction stress test (79%). Combinations of the tests increased the diagnostic values for chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

These tests have utility in evaluating patients with acromioclavicular joint pathologic lesions, and a combination of these physical tests is more helpful than isolated tests.

摘要

目的

慢性肩锁关节损伤是肩部疼痛和功能障碍的常见原因。本研究的目的是评估体格检查对孤立性慢性肩锁关节损伤的诊断价值。

研究设计

一项回顾性病例对照研究。

方法

1994年至2002年间,35例患者因孤立性肩锁关节损伤接受了锁骨远端切除术。计算了3种常用的肩锁关节损伤检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和总体准确性。

结果

交叉内收应力试验的敏感性最高(77%),其次是肩锁关节抗阻伸展试验(72%)和主动压缩试验(41%)。主动压缩试验的特异性最高(95%)。所有试验的阴性预测值均大于94%,但所有试验的阳性预测值均小于30%。主动压缩试验的总体准确性最高(92%),其次是肩锁关节抗阻伸展试验(84%)和交叉臂内收应力试验(79%)。联合试验可提高慢性肩锁关节损伤的诊断价值。

结论

这些检查对评估肩锁关节病理损伤患者有用,联合这些体格检查比单独检查更有帮助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验