Gould School of Law, University of Southern Califonia, 699 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, U.S.A.
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):801-11. doi: 10.1002/bsl.960. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
Techniques commonly used to increase truth-telling in most North American jurisdiction courts include requiring witnesses to discuss the morality of truth- and lie-telling and to promise to tell the truth prior to testifying. While promising to tell the truth successfully decreases younger children's lie-telling, the influence of discussing the morality of honesty and promising to tell the truth on adolescents' statements has remained unexamined. In Experiment 1, 108 youngsters, aged 8-16 years, were left alone in the room and asked not to peek at the answers to a test. The majority of participants peeked at the test answers and then lied about their transgression. More importantly, participants were eight times more likely to change their response from a lie to the truth after promising to tell the truth. Experiment 2 confirmed that the results of Experiment 1 were not solely due to repeated questioning or the moral discussion of truth- and lie-telling. These results suggest that, while promising to tell the truth influences the truth-telling behaviors of adolescents, a moral discussion of truth and lies does not. Legal implications are discussed.
技术常用于增加在大多数北美司法管辖区法庭说实话的意愿,包括要求证人讨论诚实和说谎的道德,并在作证前承诺说实话。虽然承诺说实话成功减少了年幼儿童的说谎行为,但讨论诚实的道德和承诺说实话对青少年陈述的影响仍未得到检验。在实验 1 中,108 名 8-16 岁的青少年被单独留在房间里,要求他们不要偷看测验答案。大多数参与者偷看了测试答案,然后对他们的违规行为撒谎。更重要的是,在承诺说实话后,参与者更有可能将他们的回答从谎言改为真话,可能性增加了八倍。实验 2 证实,实验 1 的结果并非仅仅由于重复提问或对诚实和说谎的道德讨论。这些结果表明,虽然承诺说实话会影响青少年的说实话行为,但对诚实和谎言的道德讨论并不会。讨论了法律影响。