Ahern Elizabeth C, Stolzenberg Stacia N, McWilliams Kelly, Lyon Thomas D
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Nov;34(6):784-802. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2277.
This study examined the effects of secret instructions (distinguishing between good/bad secrets and encouraging disclosure of bad secrets) and yes/no questions (DID: "Did the toy break?" versus DYR: "Do you remember if the toy broke?") on 262 maltreated and non-maltreated children's (age range 4-9 years) reports of a minor transgression. Over two-thirds of children failed to disclose the transgression in response to free recall (invitations and cued invitations). The secret instruction increased disclosures early in free recall, but was not superior to no instruction when combined with cued invitations. Yes/no questions specifically asking about the transgression elicited disclosures from almost half of the children who had not previously disclosed, and false alarms were rare. DYR questions led to ambiguous responding among a substantial percentage of children, particularly younger children. The findings highlight the difficulties of eliciting transgression disclosures without direct questions. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本研究考察了秘密指令(区分好坏秘密并鼓励披露坏秘密)以及是非问题(DID:“玩具坏了吗?”与DYR:“你还记得玩具坏了吗?”)对262名受虐待和未受虐待儿童(年龄范围4至9岁)关于一次轻微违规行为报告的影响。超过三分之二的儿童在自由回忆(邀请和提示性邀请)时未能披露该违规行为。秘密指令在自由回忆早期增加了披露率,但与提示性邀请相结合时并不优于无指令情况。专门询问违规行为的是非问题促使近一半之前未披露者进行了披露,且误报很少。DYR问题导致相当比例的儿童,尤其是年幼儿童,做出模糊回应。研究结果凸显了在没有直接问题的情况下引出违规行为披露的困难。版权所有© 2017约翰·威利父子有限公司。