Suppr超能文献

家庭医疗中更高质量的糖尿病管理是否能降低非计划性住院?

Does higher quality of diabetes management in family practice reduce unplanned hospital admissions?

机构信息

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, Alcuin A Block, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):27-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01184.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between indicators of quality of diabetic management in English family practices and emergency hospital admissions for short-term complications of diabetes.

STUDY SETTING

A total of 8,223 English family practices from 2001/2002 to 2006/2007.

STUDY DESIGN

Multiple regression analyses of associations between admissions and proportions of practice diabetic patients with good (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≤7.4 percent) and moderate (7.4 percent <HbA1c ≤10 percent) glycemic control. Covariates included diabetes prevalence, baseline admission rates, socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic characteristics.

DATA

Practice quality measures extracted from practice records linked with practice-level hospital admissions data and practice-level covariates data.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Practices with 1 percent more patients with moderate rather than poor glycemic control on average had 1.9 percent (95 percent CI: 1.1-2.6 percent) lower rates of emergency admissions for acute hyperglycemic complications. Having more patients with good rather than moderate control was not associated with lower admissions. There was no association of moderate or good control with hypoglycemic admissions.

CONCLUSION

Cross-sectionally, family practices with better quality of diabetes care had fewer emergency admissions for short-term complications of diabetes. Over time, after controlling for national trends in admissions, improvements in quality in a family practice were associated with a reduction in its admissions.

摘要

目的

调查英国家庭医疗实践中糖尿病管理质量指标与糖尿病短期并发症急诊入院之间的关联。

研究地点

2001/2002 年至 2006/2007 年的总共 8223 家英国家庭医疗实践。

研究设计

对入院率与实践中糖尿病患者良好(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]≤7.4%)和中等(7.4%<HbA1c≤10%)血糖控制比例之间的关联进行多元回归分析。协变量包括糖尿病患病率、基线入院率、社会经济、人口统计学和地理特征。

数据

从实践记录中提取的实践质量指标,与实践层面的住院数据和实践层面的协变量数据相关联。

主要发现

平均而言,实践中每增加 1%的中度血糖控制而非较差血糖控制的患者,其因急性高血糖并发症而急诊入院的比例降低 1.9%(95%CI:1.1%-2.6%)。有更多的患者获得良好而非中等控制,与入院率降低无关。中等或良好控制与低血糖入院无关联。

结论

从横截面上看,糖尿病护理质量较好的家庭医疗实践,其因糖尿病短期并发症而急诊入院的比例较低。在控制了国家住院趋势后,家庭医疗实践质量的提高与住院人数的减少有关。

相似文献

1
Does higher quality of diabetes management in family practice reduce unplanned hospital admissions?
Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):27-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01184.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
3
Quality of primary care and hospital admissions for diabetes mellitus in England.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Jul-Sep;31(3):226-38. doi: 10.1097/01.JAC.0000324668.83530.6d.
4
Potential short-term economic benefits of improved glycemic control: a managed care perspective.
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jan;24(1):51-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.1.51.
9
Outcomes and inequalities in diabetes from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012: English longitudinal study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan;67(654):e1-e9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688381. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between Outpatient Laboratory Test Age and Healthcare Utilization in Type 2 Diabetes Care.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023 Jul 1;22(2):1319-1326. doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01250-0. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Expansion of primary healthcare and emergency hospital admissions among the urban poor in Rio de Janeiro Brazil: A cohort analysis.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Sep 5;15:100363. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100363. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Progression to unscheduled hospital admissions in people with diabetes: a qualitative interview study.
BJGP Open. 2021 Aug 24;5(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0044. Print 2021 Aug.
8
Effects of Point-Of-Care Testing in General Practice for Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Ambulatory Visits and Hospitalizations.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;17(17):6185. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176185.

本文引用的文献

1
Has pay for performance improved the management of diabetes in the United Kingdom?
Prim Care Diabetes. 2010 Jul;4(2):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
4
The effects of an incentive program on quality of care in diabetes management.
Health Econ. 2009 Sep;18(9):1091-108. doi: 10.1002/hec.1536.
6
Trends in the prevalence and incidence of diabetes in the UK: 1996-2005.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Apr;63(4):332-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.080382. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
7
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians.
Public Health. 2009 Feb;123(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.11.001. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
8
Economic incentives in general practice: the impact of pay-for-participation and pay-for-compliance programs on diabetes care.
Health Policy. 2009 May;90(2-3):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
10
Improving Diabetes Care in Practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2238-43. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2034. Epub 2008 Sep 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验