Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 Mar;19(2):178-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00958.x. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
Despite the well-known beneficial effects of physical activity (PA) on the long-term outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients, the majority of this patient group remains inactive. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the most important PA determinants in type 2 diabetes patients in order to develop efficacious interventions to increase PA participation. The main aim of this study was to investigate the associations of physical environmental factors with objectively assessed and self-reported PA in type 2 diabetes patients. A total of 133 type 2 diabetes patients participated in this cross-sectional study (response rate: 43.3%). All participants completed the long International PA Questionnaire and two validated questionnaires to measure physical environmental perceptions and psychosocial factors. They also wore an accelerometer and a pedometer to measure PA objectively. Selection criteria were age 35-80, BMI 25-35 kg m(-²), treated for type 2 diabetes and no PA limitations. Data were collected in 2007. Physical environmental factors contributed significantly to the explained variance of all objective and self-reported PA measures (explained variance from 4% to 18%) after controlling for sociodemographic variables. Home PA equipment, walkability, aesthetics and convenience of PA facilities were the most consistent environmental correlates. The contribution of physical environmental factors remained significant for most PA measures after taking into account the variance explained by psychosocial factors (explained variance from 4% to 10%), except for step counts and recreational walking. Physical environmental factors could be important correlates of PA in type 2 diabetes patients, even beyond the contribution of sociodemographic and psychosocial variables, but additional research is needed. Nevertheless, sociodemographic and psychosocial factors remain very important and when developing future interventions, all these multidimensional correlates should be kept in mind.
尽管身体活动 (PA) 对 2 型糖尿病患者的长期结局有显著的有益影响,但大多数该患者群体仍处于不活跃状态。因此,为了开发有效的干预措施来提高 PA 参与度,有必要了解 2 型糖尿病患者中最重要的 PA 决定因素。本研究的主要目的是调查身体环境因素与 2 型糖尿病患者的客观评估和自我报告 PA 之间的关联。共有 133 名 2 型糖尿病患者参与了这项横断面研究(响应率:43.3%)。所有参与者都完成了长版国际 PA 问卷和两个经过验证的问卷,以测量身体环境感知和心理社会因素。他们还佩戴了加速度计和计步器来客观测量 PA。选择标准为年龄 35-80 岁、BMI 25-35 kg m(-²)、接受 2 型糖尿病治疗且无 PA 限制。数据收集于 2007 年。在控制社会人口统计学变量后,身体环境因素对所有客观和自我报告的 PA 测量指标的解释方差有显著贡献(解释方差从 4%到 18%)。家庭 PA 设备、步行性、美感和 PA 设施的便利性是最一致的环境相关性因素。在考虑心理社会因素解释的方差后,身体环境因素对大多数 PA 测量指标的贡献仍然显著(解释方差从 4%到 10%),但不包括步数和娱乐性步行。身体环境因素可能是 2 型糖尿病患者 PA 的重要相关因素,即使考虑到社会人口统计学和心理社会变量的贡献,仍需要进一步研究。然而,社会人口统计学和心理社会因素仍然非常重要,在开发未来的干预措施时,应牢记所有这些多维相关性因素。