R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Nov;24(11):677-82. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cec32c.
Retrograde nailing of open femoral fractures has presumed increased risk of knee sepsis. Our hypothesis was that the incidence of secondary knee infection after retrograde nailing of open femoral fractures is low.
Retrospective, multicenter.
Four Level I trauma centers.
A retrospective review of prospective trauma registries and fracture databases identified all open femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing from January 1, 2003, through February 15, 2007. Patients with ballistic injuries and those with less than 1 month follow up were excluded. Ninety-three open femoral fractures were identified in 90 patients. We defined a septic knee as a knee with infection that required reoperation with arthrotomy or arthroscopy. Infections at an open fracture site were defined as those treated with local irrigation and débridement and intravenously and/or orally administered antibiotics.
Open femoral shaft fractures treated with a retrograde approach.
Occurrence of an ipsilateral postoperative septic knee.
One acute septic knee was identified (1.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-3.2%) noted at time of repeat irrigation and débridement of a massive degloving wound that left no skin coverage over the knee. We also observed one late knee sepsis 2.5 years after the index procedure occurring after quadricepsplasty. The nail had been removed 1.5 years before surgery, so we did not include that case in our knee sepsis rate. Two additional infections at the open wound site did not involve the knee.
Previous publications have argued that retrograde nailing of open femoral fractures provides a potential conduit for knee infection. Our data show that risk of a septic knee as a direct result of retrograde nailing of an open femoral fracture is relatively low (1.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-3.2%). To our knowledge, this is the first case series to document the relative safety associated with retrograde nailing of open femoral fractures.
逆行髓内钉固定开放性股骨骨折被认为增加了膝关节感染的风险。我们的假设是逆行髓内钉固定开放性股骨骨折后膝关节继发感染的发生率较低。
回顾性、多中心研究。
四个一级创伤中心。
通过回顾前瞻性创伤登记处和骨折数据库,我们确定了 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2007 年 2 月 15 日期间采用逆行髓内钉治疗的所有开放性股骨骨折。排除了弹道伤患者和随访时间不足 1 个月的患者。共确定了 90 例患者中的 93 例开放性股骨骨折。我们将感染性膝关节定义为需要通过关节切开术或关节镜再次手术的膝关节感染。开放性骨折部位的感染定义为通过局部灌洗和清创术以及静脉和/或口服抗生素治疗的感染。
采用逆行入路治疗开放性股骨干骨折。
同侧术后感染性膝关节的发生情况。
在对遗留大量撕脱伤、膝关节周围无皮肤覆盖的急性患者进行再次灌洗和清创时,发现 1 例急性感染性膝关节(1.1%;95%置信区间,0.0%-3.2%)。我们还观察到 1 例迟发性膝关节感染,发生在指数手术后 2.5 年,当时进行了股四头肌成形术。在手术前 1.5 年已取出内固定物,因此我们未将该病例纳入膝关节感染率。另外 2 例开放性伤口部位的感染未累及膝关节。
先前的文献认为逆行髓内钉固定开放性股骨骨折为膝关节感染提供了潜在的途径。我们的数据表明,逆行髓内钉固定开放性股骨骨折后膝关节感染的风险相对较低(1.1%;95%置信区间,0.0%-3.2%)。据我们所知,这是第一个记录逆行髓内钉固定开放性股骨骨折相关安全性的病例系列研究。