Suppr超能文献

基于 MRI/MRSI 的经直肠超声活检在先前阴性活检的前列腺外周带和移行带患者中的准确性。

Accuracy of MRI/MRSI-based transrectal ultrasound biopsy in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate gland in patients with prior negative biopsy.

机构信息

University of Bologna, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

NMR Biomed. 2010 Nov;23(9):1017-26. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1522.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultrasound biopsy (TRUS-biopsy) performed on regions with abnormal MRI and/or MRSI for both the transition (TZ) and the peripheral (PZ) zones in patients with suspected prostate cancer with prior negative biopsy, and to analyze the relationship between MRSI and histopathological findings. MRI and MRSI were performed in 54 patients (mean age: 63.9 years, mean PSA value: 11.4 ng/mL) and the ability of MRI/MRSI-directed TRUS biopsy was evaluated. A three-point score system was used for both techniques to distinguish healthy from malignant regions. Descriptive statistics and ROC analyses were performed to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off in the three-point score system. Twenty-two out of 54 patients presented cancer at MRI/MRSI-directed TRUS biopsy, nine presented cancer only in PZ, eight both in PZ and TZ, and five exclusively in TZ. On a patient basis the highest accuracy was obtained by assigning malignancy on a positive finding with MRSI and MRI even though it was not significantly greater than that obtained using MRI alone (area under the ROC curve, AUC: 0.723 vs 0.676). On a regional (n = 648) basis the best accuracy was also obtained by considering positive both MRSI and MRI for PZ (0.768) and TZ (0.822). MRSI was false positive in 11.9% of the regions. Twenty-eight percent of cores with prostatitis were false positive findings on MRSI, whereas only 2.7% of benign prostatic hyperplasia was false positive. In conclusion, the accuracy of MRI/MRSI-directed biopsies in localization of prostate cancer is good in patient (0.723) and region analyses (0.768). The combination of both MRI and MRSI results makes TRUS-biopsy more accurate, particularly in the TZ (0.822) for patients with prior negative biopsies. Histopathological analysis showed that the main limitation of MRSI is the percentage of false positive findings due to prostatitis.

摘要

本研究旨在评估经直肠超声活检(TRUS-活检)在先前阴性活检的疑似前列腺癌患者的 MRI 和/或 MRSI 异常的 T 区(TZ)和外周区(PZ)的准确性,并分析 MRSI 与组织病理学发现之间的关系。对 54 例患者(平均年龄:63.9 岁,平均 PSA 值:11.4ng/ml)进行 MRI 和 MRSI 检查,并评估 MRI/MRSI 引导下 TRUS 活检的能力。对两种技术均采用三点评分系统来区分健康区和恶性区。采用描述性统计和 ROC 分析评估三点评分系统的准确性和最佳截断值。54 例患者中有 22 例在 MRI/MRSI 引导的 TRUS 活检中发现癌症,9 例仅在 PZ 中发现癌症,8 例在 PZ 和 TZ 中均发现癌症,5 例仅在 TZ 中发现癌症。在患者基础上,MRSI 和 MRI 均呈阳性的恶性肿瘤的诊断准确率最高,尽管与仅使用 MRI 相比,其差异无统计学意义(ROC 曲线下面积,AUC:0.723 比 0.676)。在区域(n=648)基础上,对于 PZ(0.768)和 TZ(0.822),同时考虑 MRSI 和 MRI 阳性的最佳准确性也最高。MRSI 有 11.9%的区域为假阳性。在 MRSI 上,28%的前列腺炎活检显示为假阳性,而只有 2.7%的前列腺增生为假阳性。总之,MRI/MRSI 引导的前列腺癌定位活检在患者(0.723)和区域分析(0.768)中具有良好的准确性。MRI 和 MRSI 结果的结合使 TRUS 活检更准确,特别是对于先前阴性活检的患者,TZ(0.822)更准确。组织病理学分析表明,MRSI 的主要局限性是由于前列腺炎导致的假阳性率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验