VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Oct;60(579):e378-84. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X532369.
Many self-attending patients make inappropriate use of accident and emergency departments.
To determine whether a new care method consisting of the involvement of a GP during the day with the staff of the accident and emergency department of an academic city hospital and application of the Nederlands Triage System by a practice nurse is more effective than usual care.
Before and after intervention design.
Accident and emergency department in the VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam.
Participants were patients (n = 1527) attending the accident and emergency department without a referral, on weekdays from 10.00-17.00 hours, from 1 November 2006 to 30 April 2007. The intervention consisted of a new care method that combined the involvement of a GP in the accident and emergency department and allocation of patients by triage to either the GP or the accident and emergency department physician. Main outcome measures were patient satisfaction, number and type of additional examinations, quality of diagnosis, process time, and treatment time.
Patient satisfaction with the treatment increased significantly. Compared to the usual care method, this new care method resulted in a 13% decrease in additional examinations. The percentage of incorrect diagnoses (1 %), as a measure of quality of care, was similar with the two methods. The mean process time decreased from 93 to 69 minutes (P<0.001). The mean treatment time decreased from 60 to 35 minutes (P<0.001).
The new care method resulted in greater patient satisfaction and maintained the quality of care, with fewer additional examinations. It reduced both the process time and the treatment time.
许多自行就诊的患者对急诊部门的使用不当。
确定一种新的护理方法是否比常规护理更有效,这种方法包括白天由全科医生参与,与学术城市医院的急诊部门工作人员合作,并由执业护士应用荷兰分诊系统。
干预前后设计。
阿姆斯特丹 VU 大学医学中心的急诊部门。
参与者为(n=1527)无转介的工作日(周一至周五)10.00-17.00 时段到急诊部门就诊的患者,2006 年 11 月 1 日至 2007 年 4 月 30 日。干预措施包括一种新的护理方法,该方法结合了全科医生参与急诊部门以及根据分诊将患者分配给全科医生或急诊部门医生。主要观察指标为患者满意度、额外检查的数量和类型、诊断质量、流程时间和治疗时间。
患者对治疗的满意度显著提高。与常规护理方法相比,这种新的护理方法使额外检查减少了 13%。两种方法的错误诊断率(1%)相似,这是衡量护理质量的一个指标。平均流程时间从 93 分钟减少到 69 分钟(P<0.001)。平均治疗时间从 60 分钟减少到 35 分钟(P<0.001)。
新的护理方法提高了患者满意度,保持了护理质量,减少了额外的检查。它缩短了流程时间和治疗时间。