Murphy A W
Department of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, University College Galway, Ireland.
Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;15(1):33-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.1.33.
Health services have responded to perceived 'inappropriate' attenders at accident and emergency (A&E) departments in three ways. Firstly, they have responded by attempting to decrease the numbers of patients attending A&E departments. There is little evidence supporting the efficacy of such policies. Secondly, they have responded by referring inappropriate attenders to another site. Research indicates that whilst such referral may be feasible, resultant decreases in departmental workloads have yet to be demonstrated. Patient outcome has also to be determined. Thirdly, by performing triage of attenders they provide care appropriate to their needs. Sessional GPs working in A&E departments manage non-emergency A&E attenders safely and use fewer resources than do usual A&E staff. Long-term effects on health-seeking behaviour and patient perception of the distinction between primary care services have yet to be determined.
Rather than vainly attempting to make the patients appropriate to the service, future initiatives should concentrate on making the A&E service more appropriate to the patient.
医疗服务机构针对急诊部门中被视为“不适当”的就诊者采取了三种应对方式。其一,通过试图减少前往急诊部门就诊的患者数量来应对。几乎没有证据支持此类政策的有效性。其二,通过将不适当的就诊者转至其他场所来应对。研究表明,虽然这种转诊可能可行,但部门工作量的减少尚未得到证实。患者的治疗结果也有待确定。其三,通过对就诊者进行分诊,他们提供符合其需求的护理。在急诊部门工作的兼职全科医生能够安全地处理非紧急的急诊就诊者,并且比急诊部门的常规工作人员使用更少的资源。对就医行为的长期影响以及患者对初级保健服务差异的认知仍有待确定。
未来的举措不应徒劳地试图使患者适合服务,而应专注于使急诊服务更适合患者。