• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of nurse triage in a British accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科护士分诊评估
BMJ. 1992 Apr 4;304(6831):876-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6831.876.
2
Differences in priorities assigned to patients by triage nurses and by consultant physicians in accident and emergency departments.急诊部门分诊护士和会诊医生对患者的优先级分配差异。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Aug;47(4):312-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.4.312.
3
The role of ophthalmic triage and the nurse practitioner in an eye-dedicated casualty department.眼科分诊及执业护士在眼科急症科室中的作用。
Eye (Lond). 1998;12 ( Pt 5):880-2. doi: 10.1038/eye.1998.222.
4
Nurse triage in theory and in practice.理论与实践中的护士分诊
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Sep;10(3):220-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.3.220.
5
Do formal controls always achieve control? The case of triage in accident and emergency departments.正式控制是否总能实现控制?以急诊科的分诊为例。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1994 Feb;7(1):31-42. doi: 10.1177/095148489400700104.
6
Effect of introduction of nurse triage on waiting times in a South African emergency department.南非急诊科引入护士分诊对候诊时间的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):395-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.049411.
7
Acuity and anxiety from the patient's perspective in the emergency department.从患者角度看急诊科的敏锐度与焦虑情绪
J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Nov;39(6):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2010.10.003. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
8
Quality assurance of nurse triage: consistency of results over three years.护士分诊的质量保证:三年间结果的一致性
Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;19(2):113-7. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.21317.
9
Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost.城市急诊科全科医生与常规医疗护理对比的随机对照试验:过程、结果及成本比较
BMJ. 1996 May 4;312(7039):1135-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1135.
10
Parental satisfaction with paediatric care, triage and waiting times.家长对儿科护理、分诊及候诊时间的满意度。
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Apr;26(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12202.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of the effect of introduction of JTAS in the emergency room.一项关于在急诊室引入JTAS的效果的研究。
Acute Med Surg. 2017 Mar 13;4(3):262-270. doi: 10.1002/ams2.266. eCollection 2017 Jul.
2
Factors influencing pain management by nurses in emergency departments in Central Africa.影响中非急诊科护士疼痛管理的因素。
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jul;24(7):475-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.045815.
3
Making an IMPACT on emergency department flow: improving patient processing assisted by consultant at triage.对急诊科流程产生影响:在分诊时由顾问协助改善患者处理流程。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):537-41. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003913.
4
Patient satisfaction in emergency medicine.急诊医学中的患者满意度。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):528-32. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003723.
5
NHS Direct audited.英国国民健康保险制度直接审核。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):558-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.558.
6
Triage in the developing world--can it be done?发展中世界的伤病员鉴别分类——可行吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2001 Sep;85(3):208-13. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.3.208.
7
Systems for emergency care. Integrating the components is the challenge.急救系统。整合各组成部分是一项挑战。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):955-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.955.
8
Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?曼彻斯特分诊系统能检测出危重症患者吗?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 May;16(3):179-81. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.3.179.
9
Operations research survey and computer simulation of waiting times in two medical outpatient clinic structures.两家医疗门诊机构等待时间的运筹学调查与计算机模拟
Health Care Anal. 1994 May;2(2):164-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02249741.
10
Expanding the role of the nurse in the Accident and Emergency department.扩大护士在急诊科的作用。
Postgrad Med J. 1997 Jan;73(855):17-22. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.73.855.17.

本文引用的文献

1
Triage systems.分诊系统
Nurs Clin North Am. 1981 Mar;16(1):13-24.
2
Triage nurse in the emergency department.急诊科分诊护士。
Am J Nurs. 1970 Jan;70(1):127-9.
3
Consumer assessments of the quality of medical care.消费者对医疗质量的评估。
Med Care. 1974 Apr;12(4):328-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197404000-00004.
4
Hostility in accident and emergency departments.急诊部门中的敌意行为。
Nurs Mirror. 1985 Oct 2;161(14):42-4.
5
Satisfaction with hospital emergency department as a function of patient triage.患者对医院急诊科的满意度与患者分诊的关系。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1986 Summer;11(3):21-7. doi: 10.1097/00004010-198601130-00006.
6
Nursing practice. Triage on trial.护理实践。试行分诊。
Nurs Times. 1987;83(44):65-6.
7
Accident and Emergency. The chaos controller.事故与急救。混乱控制者。
Nurs Times. 1986;82(20):66-8.
8
Triage in accident and emergency.事故与急救中的分诊
Prof Nurse. 1988 Jul;3(10):400-2.
9
Variation in demand for accident and emergency departments in England from 1974 to 1985.1974年至1985年英格兰事故与急救部门需求的变化
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988 Sep;42(3):274-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.42.3.274.
10
Triage in accident and emergency departments.急诊科的分诊
J Adv Nurs. 1990 Dec;15(12):1443-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01787.x.

英国一家急诊科护士分诊评估

Evaluation of nurse triage in a British accident and emergency department.

作者信息

George S, Read S, Westlake L, Williams B, Fraser-Moodie A, Pritty P

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Apr 4;304(6831):876-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6831.876.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.304.6831.876
PMID:1472254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1882804/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare formal nurse triage with an informal prioritisation process for waiting times and patient satisfaction.

SETTING

Accident and emergency department of a district general hospital in the midlands in 1990.

DESIGN

Patients attending between 8:00 am and 9:00 pm over six weeks were grouped for analysis according to whether triage was operating at time of presentation and by their degree of urgency as assessed retrospectively by an accident and emergency consultant.

PATIENTS

5954 patients presenting over six weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time waited between first attendance in the department and obtaining medical attention, and patient satisfaction measured by questionnaire.

RESULTS

Complete data on waiting time were collected on 5037 patients (85%). Only 1213 of the 2515 (48%) patients presenting during the triage period were seen by a triage nurse. Patients in the triage group waited longer than those in the no triage group in all four retrospective priority categories, though differences were significant for only the two most urgent categories (difference in median waiting time 10.5 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 14) min for category 1 and 8.5 (3 to 12) min for category 2). Responses to the patient satisfaction questionnaire were similar in the two groups except for the question relating to anxiety relating to pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study fails to show the benefits claimed for formal nurse triage. Nurse triage may impose additional delay for patient treatment, particularly among patients needing the most urgent attention.

摘要

目的

比较正式护士分诊与非正式优先排序流程在等待时间和患者满意度方面的差异。

背景

1990年中部地区一家区级综合医院的急诊科。

设计

对六周内上午8点至晚上9点就诊的患者,根据就诊时是否进行分诊以及急诊顾问回顾性评估的紧急程度进行分组分析。

患者

六周内就诊的5954名患者。

主要观察指标

首次到科室就诊至获得医疗护理的等待时间,以及通过问卷调查测量的患者满意度。

结果

收集了5037名患者(85%)的完整等待时间数据。在分诊期间就诊的2515名患者中,只有1213名(48%)由分诊护士接诊。在所有四个回顾性优先级类别中,分诊组患者的等待时间均长于非分诊组患者,不过只有两个最紧急类别差异具有统计学意义(1类患者中位等待时间差异为10.5(95%置信区间3.5至14)分钟,2类患者为8.5(3至12)分钟)。除了与疼痛焦虑相关的问题外,两组患者对患者满意度问卷的回答相似。

结论

本研究未能显示正式护士分诊所宣称的益处。护士分诊可能会给患者治疗带来额外延迟,尤其是在最需要紧急关注的患者中。