Center for Innovative Collaboration in Medicine & Law, Florida State University, 1115 W Call St, Ste 2350-F, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4300, USA.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(5-6):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
Some older individuals lack sufficient present cognitive and/or emotional ability to make and express autonomous decisions personally. In those situations, health-care providers routinely turn to available formal or informal surrogates who often must apply the best interests standard in making decisions for the incapacitated person. This article contends that defining the best interests standard of surrogate decision-making for older adults in terms of optimal or ideal choices (truly the patient's "best" interests) frequently sets out an unrealizable goal for surrogates to satisfy. Instead, a decision-making standard based on the incapacitated person's "therapeutic" interests is more realistic and hence more honest to adopt and apply from legal, ethical, and medical perspectives.
一些老年人缺乏足够的当前认知和/或情感能力来做出和表达自主决策。在这种情况下,医疗保健提供者通常会求助于现有的正式或非正式的代理人,这些代理人通常必须根据最佳利益标准为无能力的人做出决策。本文认为,以最优或理想选择(真正的患者“最佳”利益)来定义老年人代理决策的最佳利益标准,经常为代理人设定一个难以实现的目标。相反,基于无能力者“治疗”利益的决策标准从法律、伦理和医学角度来看,更现实,因此更诚实。