Dorr Michael, Martinetz Thomas, Gegenfurtner Karl R, Barth Erhardt
Institute for Neuro- and Bioinformatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
J Vis. 2010 Aug 26;10(10):28. doi: 10.1167/10.10.28.
How similar are the eye movement patterns of different subjects when free viewing dynamic natural scenes? We collected a large database of eye movements from 54 subjects on 18 high-resolution videos of outdoor scenes and measured their variability using the Normalized Scanpath Saliency, which we extended to the temporal domain. Even though up to about 80% of subjects looked at the same image region in some video parts, variability usually was much greater. Eye movements on natural movies were then compared with eye movements in several control conditions. "Stop-motion" movies had almost identical semantic content as the original videos but lacked continuous motion. Hollywood action movie trailers were used to probe the upper limit of eye movement coherence that can be achieved by deliberate camera work, scene cuts, etc. In a "repetitive" condition, subjects viewed the same movies ten times each over the course of 2 days. Results show several systematic differences between conditions both for general eye movement parameters such as saccade amplitude and fixation duration and for eye movement variability. Most importantly, eye movements on static images are initially driven by stimulus onset effects and later, more so than on continuous videos, by subject-specific idiosyncrasies; eye movements on Hollywood movies are significantly more coherent than those on natural movies. We conclude that the stimuli types often used in laboratory experiments, static images and professionally cut material, are not very representative of natural viewing behavior. All stimuli and gaze data are publicly available at http://www.inb.uni-luebeck.de/tools-demos/gaze.
在自由观看动态自然场景时,不同受试者的眼动模式有多相似?我们收集了一个大型眼动数据库,包含54名受试者观看18段户外场景高分辨率视频时的眼动数据,并使用归一化扫描路径显著性来测量其变异性,我们将该方法扩展到了时间领域。尽管在某些视频片段中,高达约80%的受试者看向相同的图像区域,但变异性通常要大得多。然后,我们将自然电影中的眼动与几种控制条件下的眼动进行了比较。“定格”电影与原始视频具有几乎相同的语义内容,但缺乏连续运动。好莱坞动作电影预告片被用来探究通过精心的镜头运用、场景切换等所能达到的眼动连贯性上限。在“重复观看”条件下,受试者在两天内将相同的电影各观看十次。结果显示,无论是在扫视幅度和注视持续时间等一般眼动参数方面,还是在眼动变异性方面,不同条件之间都存在一些系统性差异。最重要的是,静态图像上的眼动最初由刺激起始效应驱动,随后,相较于连续视频,更多地由受试者特有的习性驱动;好莱坞电影上的眼动比自然电影上的眼动明显更具连贯性。我们得出结论,实验室实验中常用的刺激类型,即静态图像和专业剪辑的素材,并不十分能代表自然观看行为。所有刺激和注视数据均可在http://www.inb.uni-luebeck.de/tools-demos/gaze上公开获取。