Kang Min-Suk
Vanderbilt Vision Research Center and Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
J Vis. 2009 Jan 15;9(1):17.1-11. doi: 10.1167/9.1.17.
W.J.M. Levelt systematized the influence of stimulus strength on binocular rivalry dynamics in several formal propositions. His counterintuitive 2nd proposition states that mean dominance duration of one eye's stimulus depends not on the strength of that stimulus but, instead, on the strength of the stimulus viewed by the other eye. Some studies have reported results consistent with this proposition but others have found violations of the proposition. This paper examines the dynamics of binocular rivalry by changing the size of rival stimuli and the tracking instructions during rivalry tracking periods in which the contrasts of the two rival stimuli are varied independently. Levelt's 2nd proposition was validated when those stimuli were large, but it was violated when the rival stimuli were small, suggesting that the dynamics of binocular rivalry are spatiotemporal in nature. A simple energy model with coupling among neighboring areas of rivalry can account for these findings. Other dynamics depending on the size of rival stimuli are discussed.
W.J.M. 莱尔特(Levelt)通过几个形式命题将刺激强度对双眼竞争动态的影响进行了系统化。他那违反直觉的第二个命题指出,一只眼睛刺激的平均主导持续时间并不取决于该刺激的强度,而是相反,取决于另一只眼睛所看到的刺激的强度。一些研究报告的结果与该命题一致,但其他研究则发现了与该命题相悖的情况。本文通过在双眼竞争跟踪期改变竞争刺激的大小和跟踪指令来研究双眼竞争的动态,在此期间,两个竞争刺激的对比度是独立变化的。当那些刺激较大时,莱尔特的第二个命题得到了验证,但当竞争刺激较小时,该命题则被违反,这表明双眼竞争的动态本质上是时空性的。一个在竞争相邻区域之间具有耦合的简单能量模型可以解释这些发现。还讨论了其他取决于竞争刺激大小的动态。