School of Exercise, Biomedical, and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027 Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Dec;109(6):1974-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00657.2010. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
The present study examined the reliability and validity of in vivo vastus lateralis (VL) fascicle length (L(f)) assessment by extended field-of-view ultrasonography (EFOV US). Intraexperimenter and intersession reliability of EFOV US were tested. Further, L(f) measured from EFOV US images were compared to L(f) measured from static US images (6-cm FOV) where out-of-field fascicle portions were trigonometrically estimated (linear extrapolation). Finally, spatial accuracy of the EFOV technique was assessed by comparing L(f) measured on swine VL by EFOV US to actual measurements from digital photographs. The difference between repeated VL L(f) measurements by the same experimenter was 2.1 ± 1.7% with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95-1.00]. In terms of intersession reliability, no difference (P = 0.48) was observed between L(f) measured on two different occasions, with ICC = 0.95 (CI = 0.80-0.99). The average absolute difference between L(f) measured by EFOV US and using linear extrapolation was 12.6 ± 8.1% [ICC = 0.76 (CI = -0.20-0.94)]; EFOV L(f) was always longer than extrapolated L(f). The relative error of measurement between L(f) measured by EFOV US and by dissective assessment (digital photographs) in isolated swine VL was 0.84% ± 2.6% with an ICC of 0.99 (CI = 0.94-1.00). These results show that EFOV US is a reliable and valid method for the measurement of long muscle fascicle in vivo. Thus EFOV US analysis was proven more accurate for the assessment of skeletal muscle fascicle length than conventional extrapolation methods.
本研究旨在检验采用扩展视野超声(EFOV US)评估活体股外侧肌(VL)肌束长度(L(f))的可靠性和有效性。我们测试了 EFOV US 的内实验者和内session 可靠性。此外,还将 EFOV US 图像测量的 L(f)与从静态 US 图像(6 厘米视野)测量的 L(f)进行比较,其中场外肌束部分采用三角法估算(线性外推)。最后,通过比较 EFOV US 测量的猪 VL 的 L(f)与数字照片的实际测量值,评估了 EFOV 技术的空间准确性。EFOV US 测量的重复 VL L(f)之间的差异为 2.1%±1.7%,组内相关系数(ICC)为 0.99[95%置信区间(CI)=0.95-1.00]。就 session 间可靠性而言,两次不同时间测量的 L(f)之间没有差异(P=0.48),ICC=0.95(CI=0.80-0.99)。EFOV US 测量的 L(f)与线性外推法测量的 L(f)之间的平均绝对差异为 12.6%±8.1%[ICC=0.76(CI=-0.20-0.94)];EFOV L(f)总是比外推 L(f)长。EFOV US 测量的 L(f)与离体猪 VL 的解剖评估(数字照片)之间的测量相对误差为 0.84%±2.6%,ICC 为 0.99(CI=0.94-1.00)。这些结果表明,EFOV US 是一种可靠且有效的活体长肌束测量方法。因此,EFOV US 分析比传统的外推方法更能准确评估骨骼肌束长度。